the stock market rally has 100% to do with the trillions of free money the fed has been pumping into the market. with unemployment still at 10% me thinks you can't say obamamonics is working.
ForbesIt will no doubt come as a surprise to many that money growth has been moderate since its initial explosion at the end of 2008 (see chart above). That’s because they hear so much about the expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet, which would normally imply an expansion of bank reserves and money. Fed assets have more than doubled with virtually all the increase taking place in late 2008. The asset expansion has produced a sharp rise in bank reserves, and hence the monetary base, which is composed of bank reserves and currency outside the banking system.
However, banks have not used those reserves to expand loans and investments at a rate large enough to produce rapid money expansion. Instead, banks have accumulated reserves far in excess of the amount required to back their deposit liabilities. This accumulation of “excess reserves” is no doubt the result of banker uncertainty and fear about their viability during the period of crisis. In particular, banks are remaining more liquid than regulations require to protect their remaining capital. Virtually all of the expansion in the Fed’s assets are matched by an expansion of excess reserves—excess from a regulatory standpoint, but obviously not excess to the bankers themselves since they are holding them voluntarily.
Sometimes you have to take your political lenses out and look at the actual economic statistics in order to gauge whether we’re on the road to recovery or not. Without getting personal, I’m watching many of my friends on certain cable stations attempt to trash the March employment numbers released last Friday. Don’t do it, folks. The numbers were solid.
In fact, while everyone keeps saying that small businesses are getting killed from taxes and regulations out of Washington, the reality is that the Labor Department’s household survey has produced 1.1 million new jobs in the first quarter of 2010, or 371,000 per month. If that continues, the unemployment rate will be dropping significantly.
Additionally, the corporate payroll number increased by 224,000 — not 162,000 — with the prior two months being revised up by 62,000. And if you take out the 48,000 temporary census-worker jobs, it turns out that government employment actually declined in March.
What’s my point? Credibility. Conservative credibility.
ok. So unemployment is 25% higher than his prediction if he didn't get his stimulus bill. That is what we are calling "working?" Damn. Hate to see what happens if it doesn't work.
Tell that to the people whose jobs were saved via the stimulus bill. Just because it doesn't help you directly, doesn't mean it didn't work.
Tell that to the people whose jobs were saved via the stimulus bill. Just because it doesn't help you directly, doesn't mean it didn't work.
Tell that to the people whose jobs were saved via the stimulus bill. Just because it doesn't help you directly, doesn't mean it didn't work.
1. Money supply increases are at their lowest levels since 1995.
2. In addition, although unemployment is still at 9.7%, the four-week moving average for jobless claims fell to its lowest level last week
Having read the article, they went way out of their way to make this sound as good as possible.The Standard & Poor's 500-stock index is up more than 74% from its recessionary low in March 2009. Corporate bonds have been rallying for a year. Commodity prices have surged. International currency markets have been bullish on the dollar for months, raising it by almost 10% since Nov. 25 against a basket of six major currencies. Housing prices have stabilized. Mortgage rates are low.
Why the Obama Plan Is Working - BusinessWeek
Let the gnashing of teeth begin.
I have a hard time buying into anything "economically positive" right now. I started my career as a machinist in 1985, as soon as I graduated high school. I was blessed to raise two children and have a pretty good life. Then boom, in February of this year I was let go because of "lack of work". I don't enjoy playing the blame game but three months later, with 25 years of journeyman's experience under my belt and I still can't find a job. Something's wrong with this scene..........Commish.....
the stock market rally has 100% to do with the trillions of free money the fed has been pumping into the market.
with unemployment still at 10% me thinks you can't say obamamonics is working.
Given what you say your background is, I think you are disingenuous to link 2009-2010 policies with the labor market. Actually, any policy with any contemporaneous labor market.
generally speaking you are 100% correct. but when you spend a $1 trillion to "save jobs" in 2009 and 2010 you are no longer given that lag time.
Obamanomics??????????????? I thank him every day for the furlough days that I have to take. I had to take 5 before Christmas and 3 before May. Its working well down here where real people live. After my wifes plant closed where she was a superviser for 28 years, it took her 362 days to find a part time job. All the numbers may look good in the books, but they don't translate very well to main street.
There really is nashing of teeth.