fryeguy93
Rufus X. Sarsaparilli
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 9,015
- Likes
- 21,855
1. They would have to move the draft.
2. They would move the draft.
3. Summer leagues would disappear. Sad face? Who cares?
4. Kids go to summer school all the time. (Someone can correct me here) I don't think that costs the school any significant money. Non scholly-guys would be screwed in that scenario(I think). A radical solution would be to give baseball the fall off. Maybe let the "Summer leagues" become "fall leagues". Obviously that wouldn't go over well at football schools, but it is an idea, I suppose.
5. Although I agree - I don't care that the B1G sucks in baseball - I do appreciate the fact that the current schedule is completely unfair to all the northern schools. Southern schools would still have an advantage, as I assume you would emulate the MLB schedule. Its still cold in Michigan in April. Practicing before then would be significantly more difficult up there than in the south. Moving the schedule wouldn't eliminate the disadvantage, but it would at least acknowledge that those schools exist. I also think it would increase national attendance on a massive scale, and likely put a lot more schools in that revenue production column.
NCAA has zero control over the amateur Draft. And MLB would never move the Draft enough to make significant summer play possible. They need the high school guys in camp and rookie league ASAP.
MLB will not even allow guys to go to Olympics, they're certainly not giving flexibility to college.
Then you would have college guys leaving their teams in the middle of the season to protect their money and health.
Far fewer players would even go to college to avoid the conflict and college baseball would die.
There's more problems with changing the schedule than leaving as is.
Having a few months without inter collegiate sports is actually a positive. Leave the summer alone