Why you never cite Bleacher Report as a source...

[csheaton]

He was definitely off-sides. THAT is the reason he chucked it deep. EVERYONE in the stadium thought it was a free play for us. EXCEPT the refs... of course. Haven't ya'll gotten used to this **** yet?

Yeah pretty much. I thought it was crap too. But when it rains it pours. We should have gotten at least 3 points there, as well as from the time UF's punter fumbled the snap. So frustrating there, in the first play.

 

[tallyho]

Tennessee QB Nate Peterman Gets Rocked as His Offensive Line Doesn't Move | Bleacher Report

They're a joke. Always have been. Always will be.

Edit: Joke...blog...same thing.

Bleacher Report writers are not professional sportswriters. They are everyday Joes who are writing their opinion rather than facts...You and I could write for that rag and say Tennessee is going to win all the rest of its games and play in the Sugar Bowl and make up reasons why...just saying.

 

[orangeluvr]

BR doesn't make the cut for the boom boom room library. :no:

 

[BearCat204]

Discipline. They never heard the snap count that was called in the huddle.

Plus it might make a defender hesitate and allow for a big play.

JMO, but the probable negative outcome from not blocking a single defensive lineman far outweigh any luck play we may get out of it. Evidently the coaching staff sees it differently which is why they are being paid to coach that and Im not I suppose. Im just not a fan of it at all and can only see us getting one of our QBs decapitated.

 

[Boca Vol]

Bleacher Report writers are not professional sportswriters. They are everyday Joes who are writing their opinion rather than facts...You and I could write for that rag and say Tennessee is going to win all the rest of its games and play in the Sugar Bowl and make up reasons why...just saying.

Then posters on here would say that BR gets it and is the most credible source on the Internet.