Other_Guy
foolishFool
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 12,337
- Likes
- 13,635
Not because heās better. But theyāve been careful with Sampson all camp. I think heās recovering from something and they wonāt risk it against Chatt.Umm...you think Bishop will start over Sampson? The fiery leader and by far most talented RB on the roster? Huh?
Not because heās better. But theyāve been careful with Sampson all camp. I think heās recovering from something and they wonāt risk it against Chatt.
From there on though he will be the starter
As among his biggest proponents I would love him to get a start, but LATELY, I have been getting the redo vibes for Peyton LEWIS to be a huge contributor HIS freshman year. No basis, just a gut feeling. Combining the names of two of our most prolific players ever may have triggered this. I am sometimes a bit of a simpleton.Not because heās better. But theyāve been careful with Sampson all camp. I think heās recovering from something and they wonāt risk it against Chatt.
From there on though he will be the starter
Told you so!As predicted...it's OR Chart
View attachment 670489
As predicted...it's OR Chart
View attachment 670489
That LEO list is insane lolAs predicted...it's OR Chart
View attachment 670489
Well this doesn't tell us anything lolAs predicted...it's OR Chart
View attachment 670489
A little strongā¦Are you retarded? You said Bishop would be listed as starter and he is listed third. IgnORe the or and look who is listed first. You think Nimrod is starting over Squirrel?
Contrarian? Sure. If you canāt review the entire document and deduce the players are listed vertically, by depth, within each position group, without respect to the -or-, I canāt help you.Heās not 3rd.
It says āorā.
Yep. More "OR's" than on a viking longship!As predicted...it's OR Chart
View attachment 670489