Will NCAA review this play regarding NEW rules?

#76
#76
truevol8 said:
The thing that is getting missed here is the referee signaled TOUCHDOWN first and foremost. He was standing right on the goal line when the play happened,why didn't he signal fumble or touchback first. Now with that said when they went to review it there was no clear evidence(100%) by the way the rules are stated for them to overturn the original call of a TOUCHDOWN. That's where the problem lies is with the initial call of a Touchdown on the play. Everybody knew he fumbled the ball but on review they could not say 100% it was a fumble from all the views I have seen. His fingers were still touching the ball when the ball crossed the plane of the goal line and I know he has to have control of the ball but evidence didn't show he didn't have control of the ball with his fingertips. Its no difference then a fingertip or one handed catch in the endzone or the sideline.
Click to expand...

It wasn't missed, we had 3-4 threads about it where it was discussed ad nauseum. So stop hijacking this thread.
 
#77
#77
Vols520 said:
You are simply a crybaby. The rule is fine for numerous reasons and I don't have to prove anything as the rule book is on my side.

Yiur argument is simply it's not fair.
Click to expand...

Again you have failed to provide any kind of proof. All you can say is your deflection statement "I don't have to prove anything because the rule book is on my side."

I have stated my opinion as to why I think the rule is dumb. Why can't you state yours? You say it's fine for many reasons, please name them.

My argument is simply its a dumb rule because its not consistent with the rest of the field. I am not being biased. I have always thought this rule was dumb. It should not be in the NFL or in college.
 
#78
#78
BigOrangeTrain said:
Again you have failed to provide any kind of proof. All you can say is your deflection statement "I don't have to prove anything because the rule book is on my side."

I have stated my opinion as to why I think the rule is dumb. Why can't you state yours? You say it's fine for many reasons, please name them.

My argument is simply its a dumb rule because its not consistent with the rest of the field. I am not being biased. I have always thought this rule was dumb. It should not be in the NFL or in college.
Click to expand...

If the endzone should be consistent with the rest of the field, then I'd like to hear your argument as to why an offensive player being tackled in his own endzone should not be a safety. Rather the offense should snap the ball from the spot in the endzone where he was tackled.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#79
#79
VolsSportsFan said:
It wasn't missed, we had 3-4 threads about it where it was discussed ad nauseum. So stop hijacking this thread.
Click to expand...

Nobodys hijacking this thread and you are NOTHING more than your names says: a VolsSportsFan. I deal with people like you everyday of my life that think they are never wrong at anything and what you spew out of your mouth is GOSPEL. Hate to bust your bubble but you apparently need attention and come on here to spew.
 
#80
#80
BigOrangeTrain said:
Again you have failed to provide any kind of proof. All you can say is your deflection statement "I don't have to prove anything because the rule book is on my side."

I have stated my opinion as to why I think the rule is dumb. Why can't you state yours? You say it's fine for many reasons, please name them.

My argument is simply its a dumb rule because its not consistent with the rest of the field. I am not being biased. I have always thought this rule was dumb. It should not be in the NFL or in college.
Click to expand...

My argument is you are an idiot. And I already used the safety example but you ignored it.
 
#81
#81
BigOrangeTrain said:
Again you have failed to provide any kind of proof. All you can say is your deflection statement "I don't have to prove anything because the rule book is on my side."

I have stated my opinion as to why I think the rule is dumb. Why can't you state yours? You say it's fine for many reasons, please name them.

My argument is simply its a dumb rule because its not consistent with the rest of the field. I am not being biased. I have always thought this rule was dumb. It should not be in the NFL or in college.
Click to expand...

So to clarify: you think the rule is dumb and i simply think you are dumb.
 
#82
#82
truevol8 said:
Nobodys hijacking this thread and you are NOTHING more than your names says: a VolsSportsFan. I deal with people like you everyday of my life that think they are never wrong at anything and what you spew out of your mouth is GOSPEL. Hate to bust your bubble but you apparently need attention and come on here to spew.
Click to expand...

He was simple saying this thread is about the Rule, not the fumble.
 
#84
#84
bamawriter said:
If the endzone should be consistent with the rest of the field, then I'd like to hear your argument as to why an offensive player being tackled in his own endzone should not be a safety. Rather the offense should snap the ball from the spot in the endzone where he was tackled.
Click to expand...

Sorry but you're an Alabama fan therefore your opinions and questions are invalid. Go back to the sticks.

Just for clarity I am referring to a fumble that WAS NOT RECOVERED and rolled out of bounds. That's all.
 
#85
#85
truevol8 said:
Nobodys hijacking this thread and you are NOTHING more than your names says: a VolsSportsFan. I deal with people like you everyday of my life that think they are never wrong at anything and what you spew out of your mouth is GOSPEL. Hate to bust your bubble but you apparently need attention and come on here to spew.
Click to expand...

Please get help.
 
#89
#89
Guys we have a better chance of the NCAA to go to an NFL type overtime than to change the fumbling rule in OT.

Sucks that these things happen to us but honestly I really like the NCAA ot system but I would like to see them back the starting line back at midfield instead of where it is now but they won't do that either because of the possibility of too long of games that's why after so many you have to start going for two and that's when it starts getting unpredictable.
 
#90
#90
JohnMarxism said:
The rule is not fine. If a player makes a play for 109 yards(kickoff return in regulation) but is tackled at the 1/2 yard line and loses the ball into the endzone, then you are telling me that the ruling is justified in that the ball should just be given over to the other team? The same applies to any type of play for any amount of yards.
Click to expand...

So ur saying if a team has a 90 yard drive and the qb throws a pick in the end zone that it would be stupid to consider it a turnover and since we had such a good drive that we should get a chance to redo the play. NO a turnover is a turnover. Hold on to the ball and protect it with ur life but I don't blame pig at all for his effort
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#92
#92
BigOrangeTrain said:
Again you have failed to provide any kind of proof. All you can say is your deflection statement "I don't have to prove anything because the rule book is on my side."

I have stated my opinion as to why I think the rule is dumb. Why can't you state yours? You say it's fine for many reasons, please name them.

My argument is simply its a dumb rule because its not consistent with the rest of the field. I am not being biased. I have always thought this rule was dumb. It should not be in the NFL or in college.
Click to expand...

Your right it's not consistent with the rest of the field. You get points for getting in the endzone unlike anywhere else.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top