Other_Guy
foolishFool
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 12,659
- Likes
- 14,269
I saw plenty of times where people were calling for the OL's heads. How come no one ever pushed for playing time? If these guys will benefit from being a year into the system, why were some people saying they weren't that good instead of saying the system was hurting them (old 5)?
Those guys had a million starts and was a very, very good OL. Again, they kept the team from looking as bad or worse than UK. I'm not saying that in 2 or 3 years these upcoming guys will be good, I'm saying next year, especially early, it will be a huge drop off. That's like saying Bray made some bone head plays and never won a big game, but we got 1 vetern all star and 3 very talented freshman behind him so no huge worries.
If they don't have great QB play and the backs step up more than they did this past year, the new OL will get demolished against good defenses because our last OL barely kept that from happening.
Again I'm not talking about in 2 or 3 years I'm talking about just next year how they will hold up.
Those guys had a million starts and was a very, very good OL. Again, they kept the team from looking as bad or worse than UK. I'm not saying that in 2 or 3 years these upcoming guys will be good, I'm saying next year, especially early, it will be a huge drop off. That's like saying Bray made some bone head plays and never won a big game, but we got 1 vetern all star and 3 very talented freshman behind him so no huge worries.
If they don't have great QB play and the backs step up more than they did this past year, the new OL will get demolished against good defenses because our last OL barely kept that from happening.
Again I'm not talking about in 2 or 3 years I'm talking about just next year how they will hold up.