BigOrangeTrain
Morior Invictus
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 76,207
- Likes
- 87,545
Who cared what he has or hasnt done in 100 days? Look what he walked into. He had to follow the worst POTUS in modern history. Lets see after 4 years. Or, if he is held to the same standard as Obama, lets see after 8 years.
The media never truly examined all of trumps scandals and corruption? Are you truly a professor? Wow 😭You may find it hard to believe, but nothing you say here is true, other than "pro-Trump" outlets getting an FBI investigation, because they're Russian smear campaigns in reality.
The media, while admittedly liberal in general, never did its actual job with Trump. The only time it actually did its job with Trump was with *****gate. Other than that they couldn't have helped him more had they intended it.
The media never truly examined all of Trump's scandals and corruption. The man literally has 30-40 years of abject depravity and corruption to choose from, including his culminating act of colluding with the Kremlin to win the 2016 election (which was obvious since at least November/December to anyone who actually gave a damn), and yet the media just focused on his stupid tweets.
For the record, you're so over your head, just like Trump, I don't understand why you keep trying.
The thing is none of what you said is true. :dunno:
As you read the analysis, keep in mind that Steve Schmidt is one of the main reasons that Sarah Palin ever became relevant.
Trump is an assclown.... but he's an assclown that won an election. The last 100 days are as much about the environment as they are about Trump himself.
While I will forever throw libertarianism under the bus, where it belongs, you are one of the rare good guys in their ranks that I will actually listen to. In fact, even defend at times.
You are a true patriot. A very misguided one, in my opinion, but a true patriot.
A genuine good guy.
With shrinking departments, I mean staff cuts.
Bringing back manufacturing because of less regulations and lower cost is a good thing. Bringing it back because of increased barriers is a bad thing. We have to use tariffs as a threat so we don't get taken advantage of anymore. For us to trade our product into China, we pay tariffs and duties.
You know Trump can write an EO on the wall and Congress can't stop him? The last administration was strangling the economy so much that it was going to crash. Unfortunately those signs haven't been completely stopped yet.
What's wrong with encouraging businesses to stay here? Or even publicly shaming them? That's what tax reform is.
I also forgot, to implement a new regulation, you have to take out two existing ones. That's also a new rule.
No. We don't have to use tariffs. We can continue doing the things that make us the wealthiest country in the world. I'd prefer that.
We are not getting taken advantage of. People who don't understand the economics of trade are being taken advantage of by Trump.
Well I *think* an EO could be challenged by Congress if a majority beloved that it had not granted the POTUS authority to do so on a certain issue. Any rate, bogus EOs to date have been blocked judicially of course.
Businesses considering moving operations... Agreed but I'm a fan of the invisible hand. The main problem IMO isn't our taxes or system... Rather its countries like China that fail to open their markets to our firms while we're essentially open to theirs.
The president has the only authority to change things like immigration policy and national security. The Travel Ban being rejected is actually not in the judiciary's authority. It's overreach.
90% of his EOs have not been rejected.
Everybody can't be a rocket surgeon, or a brian scientist.No. We don't have to use tariffs. We can continue doing the things that make us the wealthiest country in the world. I'd prefer that.
We are not getting taken advantage of. People who don't understand the economics of trade are being taken advantage of by Trump.
It is impossible for our companies to trade with China as they are allowed to Dump their goods on us. Why should we continue to support unilateral agreements that aren't free trade?
-redacted quote-
Trump is an assclown.... but he's an assclown that won an election.
Where do you get this stuff? Do you actually believe what The Donald is Tweeting? :loco: Come on, man, this is common knowledge... you're smarter than this.
"Like both legislative statutes and regulations promulgated by government agencies, executive orders are subject to judicial review and may be overturned if the orders lack support by statute or the Constitution"
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order_(United_States)#Legal_conflicts
View attachment 129567
What good are cheap goods when people are unemployed?
It's a two edged sword. What we're also seeing is the worst opposition behavior ever.