Would Obama send US troops into African Civil Wars?

#29
#29
lawgator1 said:
Not in so many words... But in substance, yup.
Click to expand...

So we code it, but you sir have broken through the secret language we speak and have figured it out.

To go along with this, anything Obama or Biden says that is not cloaked but explicit, you have an excuse for, and are the one that is capable of explaining to us what they really mean?

This sums things up?
 
Last edited:
#30
#30
allvol123 said:
So we code it, but you sir have broken through the secret language we speak and have figured it out.

To go along with this, anything Obama or Biden says that is not cloaked but explicit, you have an excuse for, and are the one that is capable of explaining to us what they really mean?

This sums things up?
Click to expand...
QUICK! Everyone reset their decoder rings to setting XK59J
 
#32
#32
allvol123 said:
So we code it, but you sir have broken through the secret language we speak and have figured it out.

To go along with this, anything Obama or Biden says that is not cloaked but explicit, you have an excuse for, and are the one that is capable of explaining to us what they really mean?

This sums things up?
Click to expand...


No, never claimed that. I have spoken up against a number of things that Obama has said. For example, when he said during a debate with Clinton that he would meet with leaders of Iran and North Korea without precondition I said that was a terrible idea and showed naivete to how those things are done. I have said he did not do enough to denounce Wright in the early going. There are others.

I just think that in the last week or so the Palin attacks (less so the McCain ones for obvious reason) have become increasingly shrill, irresponsible, and inciting fear over exaggerated things.
 
#33
#33
lawgator1 said:
No, never claimed that. I have spoken up against a number of things that Obama has said. For example, when he said during a debate with Clinton that he would meet with leaders of Iran and North Korea without precondition I said that was a terrible idea and showed naivete to how those things are done. I have said he did not do enough to denounce Wright in the early going. There are others.

I just think that in the last week or so the Palin attacks (less so the McCain ones for obvious reason) have become increasingly shrill, irresponsible, and inciting fear over exaggerated things.
Click to expand...

This explains every thing...........

:nono:
 
#34
#34
OrangeEmpire said:
This explains every thing...........

:nono:
Click to expand...


I only included that to reference how far back it was that I had owned up to disliking some of what he says or does. I still think that posiiton is wrong. He has tried to wriggle out of it, unconvincingly I think, and he'd be better off now IMO if he just said he now thought better of that and would not meet with such leaders.
 
#35
#35
lawgator1 said:
I only included that to reference how far back it was that I had owned up to disliking some of what he says or does. I still think that posiiton is wrong. He has tried to wriggle out of it, unconvincingly I think, and he'd be better off now IMO if he just said he now thought better of that and would not meet with such leaders.
Click to expand...

There is no need to back peddle........

It explains ever thing.....

:hi:
 
#36
#36
lawgator1 said:
I just think that in the last week or so the Palin attacks (less so the McCain ones for obvious reason) have become increasingly shrill, irresponsible, and inciting fear over exaggerated things.
Click to expand...

Good thing Obama does none of this.
 
#37
#37
lawgator1 said:
I think he will because he's black and only cares about black people, because he's Muslim and only cares about fellow Muslims, because he wants to break our military's spirit, because its better than blowing up the Pentago with his buddies, and because he likes to torture kittens and old people.

Oh, and because Jeremiah Wright will order him to.
Click to expand...

Great insight LG. I haven't heard the kitten part before, have you been hanging out with B. Hussien Obama?:)
 
#39
#39
lawgator1 said:
I think he will because he's black and only cares about black people, because he's Muslim and only cares about fellow Muslims, because he wants to break our military's spirit, because its better than blowing up the Pentago with his buddies, and because he likes to torture kittens and old people.

Oh, and because Jeremiah Wright will order him to.
Click to expand...

Damn Right

Repubs do need to make up their minds about his religious beliefs however.

How can he be a Muslim when he went to Rev Wrights church for twenty years. He is either a radical christian or muslim.

Cant be both.

Oh wait I forgot he is a godless Commie too.:)
 
#40
#40
lazy4163 said:
How can he be a Muslim when he went to Rev Wrights church for twenty years. He is either a radical christian or muslim.

Cant be both.
Click to expand...
why not? Wright is simply Farrakhan preaching the same ridiculous message from a different book.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#41
#41
BigPapaVol said:
why not? Wright is simply Farrakhan preaching the same ridiculous message from a different book.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

And they both preach about the hateful evil white men and then drive back to their homes in very upscale "white" neighborhoods and dine in upscale restaurants with Whitey!

They are the same person they're pimps!
 
#42
#42
BigPapaVol said:
why not? Wright is simply Farrakhan preaching the same ridiculous message from a different book.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Not even close. The messages between the pastors may have similarities, but it is impossible for him to be both. For all they may agree on, Farrakan and Wright have would have subtantial differences in theology. For all the intolerance one can find in the Bible, it doesn't even compare to that found in the Qu'ran.
 
#43
#43
rjd970 said:
Not even close. The messages between the pastors may have similarities, but it is impossible for him to be both. For all they may agree on, Farrakan and Wright have would have subtantial differences in theology. For all the intolerance one can find in the Bible, it doesn't even compare to that found in the Qu'ran.
Click to expand...
now let me get this straight. You're telling me that the Bible and the Koran are different books and that preachers from the different religions would ascribe to different theology.

Who knew?
 
#44
#44
rjd970 said:
Not even close. The messages between the pastors may have similarities, but it is impossible for him to be both. For all they may agree on, Farrakan and Wright have would have subtantial differences in theology. For all the intolerance one can find in the Bible, it doesn't even compare to that found in the Qu'ran.
Click to expand...

Wright is all about Black Liberation Theology.

Louie is all about the Nation of Islam and African American Interests.
 
#45
#45
BigPapaVol said:
now let me get this straight. You're telling me that the Bible and the Koran are different books and that preachers from the different religions would ascribe to different theology.

Who knew?
Click to expand...

All I am telling you is he can't be both Muslim and Christian.
 
#49
#49
BigPapaVol said:
Are you seriously telling me this?
Click to expand...

Yes, I seriously am. Did you not say:


lazy4163:
Originally Posted by lazy4163
How can he be a Muslim when he went to Rev Wrights church for twenty years. He is either a radical christian or muslim.

Cant be both.
Click to expand...

BigPapaVol:
why not? Wright is simply Farrakhan preaching the same ridiculous message from a different book.
Click to expand...
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top