Would one of our obamanoids defend his latest fiasco??

#26
#26
Blaming all muslims today for the destruction and suppression of Christian churches 1300 years ago is like blaming Catholics today for the Inquisition.

It would be the same or at least similar if Catholics were still having an inquisition to root out secret moslems and if moslems had ceased to destroy Christian buildings and cultures but neither is true.

How about the current destruction of churches and monesteries in Kosovo and desecration of Christian cemeteries in Kosovo and Samarkland??

BTW, Moslems killed more people in the name of islamic jihad in 2009 that were killed by Catholics during the whole duration of the inquisition.

Liberal orthodoxy leads to infringement on the right to free speech in order to appease islam and/or moslems.

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/11/elisabeths-voice-update.html#more

One week from today Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff will go on trial in Vienna for “hate speech” — or, more precisely, for “denigrating religious teachings” — in a lecture she gave as part of one of her informational seminars about Islam.
--------------------------------------

Elisabeth is using the seminar transcript to prepare a point-by-point rebuttal of the charges filed against her.

She will demonstrate that her statements represent an accurate account of sharia as established through a consensus of the scholars of Islamic law.

Reliance of the Traveller by al-Misri, the most authoritative treatise in the Shafi’ite School of Islamic Law, will be one of her primary sources.

Both of Obambi's appointees to the us supreme court are sympathetic to incorporation of sharia law into American courts, especially Kagan.

One of Obambi's reps sent to the UN human rights council, Koh, if very sympathetic to international and sharia law being used in American courts.
 
Last edited:
#27
#27
UN IGNORES HAITI AND DARFUR BUT POINTS FINGERS AT U.S. AND ISRAEL | RUTHFULLY YOURS

Over in Turtle Bay, the U.N. General Assembly is now wrapping up its key fall session. After taking a good hard look at human rights violations around the globe, it has come to the following conclusions about the world’s ills: In 2010, eighty percent of all its condemnations of alleged human rights abuses – twenty-one resolutions – will have been directed at Israel alone.

The Assembly will also finish the year having decided that only six more of the 192 U.N. member states raise human rights concerns. Warranting a single resolution each are Afghanistan, Burma, Georgia, Iran, North Korea, and the United States.
---------------------------------------

All these busy bees, however, could not manage to come up with a single resolution about the horrors in Sudan – where reports of government forces killing and raping civilians in Darfur continue to surface. Tens of thousands have fled in fear this year alone, while humanitarian relief is deliberately impeded by the government in Khartoum.

Nor did the General Assembly think Haiti warranted a resolution, though the U.N. is at the center of recent riots amid claims that its peacekeepers have fueled the cholera epidemic already affecting eighteen thousand residents.

The billion Chinese without elementary civil and political rights went unnoticed.

Millions of Saudi women, trapped in their homes at the will of their male guardians, were forgotten. And no mention was made of the other myriad number of non-democracies and human rights basket cases where torture, female genital mutilation and gross violations of every kind are routine.
------------------------------------

A few days later, on November 9, the Council followed-up by presenting the administration with a list of recommended reforms, itemized together with the proud sponsors. They included:
“end all forms of racial discrimination” (Libya);

“ensure the implementation of U.S. obligations under international humanitarian law…” (Iran);

“end excessive use of force by law enforcement bodies” (China); and

“ban torture and other ill-treatment in U.S. detention facilities” (North Korea).

How did the Obama administration react to this travesty? Esther Brimmer, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International Organization Affairs, told the assembled: “The work of this very Council is very close to the history and culture of our country.” — A rolling-over-in-the-grave moment for Founding Fathers, if there ever was one.

Senator Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) is the only senator to insist on an annual accounting of all the money U.S. taxpayers send to the U.N. every year. He finally extracted the information for the fiscal year 2009: $6.35 billion, or about 23% of the U.N.’s budget from all sources.

Isn’t it about time our dollars were put to better use?

They also seemed to be unable to bring themselves to mention over a half million black Africans who live as slaves in Mauritania or over a billion people in the world who live in areas where one can be put to death if accused of insulting muhammed, the false prophet or insulting islam, the vilest religion ever known to man.

Power Line - Obama's message to the world

The Obama administration has a message for the world. The message is something along these lines: The United States is very bad, but Barack Obama is very good. He seeks to redeem America from its evil.

Eye on the UN has compiled the disgusting video below of the United States abasing itself before some of the most reprehensible regimes in the world. I believe this is what goes under the name of "smart diplomacy" in the Obama administration.
-----------------------------------------

Assistant Secretary of State Michael Posner made an appearance to play his designated role demeaning the United States on behalf of the Obama administration. Posner replied "thanks to very many of the delegations for thoughtful comments and suggestions" shortly after Cuba said the U.S. blockade of Cuba was a "crime of genocide," Iran "condemned and expressed its deep concern over the situation of human rights" in the United States, and North Korea said it was "concerned by systematic widespread violations committed by the United States at home and abroad."

Carl in Jerusalem aptly comments: "The key foreign policy goal of the Obama administration is to destroy the notion that America is an exceptional nation, and to cut it down to the same size as brutal dictatorships around the world. Trying to cut down America's most feisty ally by forcing it into a situation where it will have to fight for its very existence is part of the same 'strategy.'"
 
#28
#28
Obama continued TARP and, with Bush, saved the world from economic meltdown. We're getting a lot of that back

Obama authorized trillions in spending to create demand for good and services, which saved jobs. Was it 100 percent effective? Did every dollar authorized flow into making or preserving a job? No. But estimates are up to 2 million jobs saved by it.

Obama created a demand for 30 million new insurance policy holders.
 
#30
#30
Obama continued TARP and, with Bush, saved the world from economic meltdown. We're getting a lot of that back

Obama authorized trillions in spending to create demand for good and services, which saved jobs. Was it 100 percent effective? Did every dollar authorized flow into making or preserving a job? No. But estimates are up to 2 million jobs saved by it.

Obama created a demand for 30 million new insurance policy holders.

You started at 100% efficiency with a government operated project?
 
#31
#31
Obama continued TARP and, with Bush, saved the world from economic meltdown. We're getting a lot of that back

Obama authorized trillions in spending to create demand for good and services, which saved jobs. Was it 100 percent effective? Did every dollar authorized flow into making or preserving a job? No. But estimates are up to 2 million jobs saved by it.

Obama created a demand for 30 million new insurance policy holders.

Interesting conjecture but what does that have to do with the UN human rights council and the sorry lot of miscreants obama sent to defend America against the bogus claims of the likes of China, North Korea, Iran, Libya and Cuba??
 
#32
#32
Obama continued TARP and, with Bush, saved the world from economic meltdown. We're getting a lot of that back

Obama authorized trillions in spending to create demand for good and services, which saved jobs. Was it 100 percent effective? Did every dollar authorized flow into making or preserving a job? No. But estimates are up to 2 million jobs saved by it.

Obama created a demand for 30 million new insurance policy holders.

Job's saved?

This is the best. I love you Obama fans who go with this.

Define jobs saved? How does one know a job was saved? They can't say job created because the only jobs created were Gov jobs and not private sector. So they throw a bone to people like you who they know will run with it and say jobs saved.

Seriously. It's almost pathetic.
 
#33
#33
Job's saved?

This is the best. I love you Obama fans who go with this.

Define jobs saved? How does one know a job was saved? They can't say job created because the only jobs created were Gov jobs and not private sector. So they throw a bone to people like you who they know will run with it and say jobs saved.

Seriously. It's almost pathetic.

Almost???

(Not to mention it has not one whit to do with the topic of the thread.)
 
#34
#34
Obama’s Minions Revel At UN As USA Is Flogged By Ambassadors Of Despots | Here's The Right Side Of It

Among the list of accusers who were given the forum to allege American crimes and atrocities were representatives from – North Korea, Cuba, Iran, China, Egypt, Nicaragua and Libya.

It was an indescribably embarrassing display of a foreign policy that is carefully crafted to break and destroy the greatest nation in the world – a country that has liberated more people from tyranny, and provided its citizens the opportunity to achieve a standard of living unparalleled in history.

So, I ask not the question now – I am telling you: Things are going to get much worse until and unless this nation escorts Barack Hussein Obama out the door of the White House after the 2012 election.

The very idea that he could be re-elected to continue the destruction is – unthinkable.
 

VN Store



Back
Top