You don't have to that smart to get a 4.0. just hard work.
i can agree with that to some degree. You're definitely smart with a 4.0, it's just there could easily be others smarter than you at 4.0 as well. But I just think you can manage better than a 23, standardized test or not. I'm not trying to brag, but I made a 32 overall, so I saw no reason to take it again. I also only managed a 3.7 GPA in high school, but I took some harder math classes, some AP courses and some advanced courses.
stop your bragging.
There was no way for me to get around to why i have my feelings. I guess I just don't know much from the other side. I'm obviously a better tester than I am at working hard to get the grade. A very good friend of mine (well she was back then), was definitely not one of the smartest in our class, but she didn't take any AP courses, only took the required math courses, but did take some advanced English classes and snuck away with co "valid victorian" honors. She studies like no one else though. I know I beat her in the ACT, but she didn't make a 23 either. I just can't grasp the idea of a 4.0 and a 23.
Like VIA said though, it's a qualifying score.
i can agree with that to some degree. You're definitely smart with a 4.0, it's just there could easily be others smarter than you at 4.0 as well. But I just think you can manage better than a 23, standardized test or not. I'm not trying to brag, but I made a 32 overall, so I saw no reason to take it again. I also only managed a 3.7 GPA in high school, but I took some harder math classes, some AP courses and some advanced courses.