WWE Thread III

Smart move on making him heel . WWE is really lacking heels but he was gonna be the biggest baby face in the company
 
So I take it Ownens costs Zayn and Zayn costs Owens. So Sheamus and Styles are locked for the MITB match.
 
All Rollins remaining heel tells me is he will lose to Roman the next two ppvs after Roman kicks out of three straight pedigrees.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Here's how I'd book this.

Rollins wins the title at MITB

Ambrose immediately cashes in his recently won briefcase.

At Battleground only Rollins gets his rematch clause (say something like he has a clause in his contract that his rematches must be 1on1 so we don't jump the gun on the Shield triple threat)

Rollins wins it back at Battleground setting up the Shield triple threat at SummerSlam

Have whoever win there I guess
 
Sadly I don't see Ambrose winning the title for years

He has been booked badly since the shield split and his character work has been inconsistent (at least he has a character though). But the way I did it he's not getting super booking. He wins it on a cash in and loses the next month.
 
I'll play devil's advocate here. How much sense would it make for him to come back and all of a sudden love the fans and be a face after being booed and called a weak champion the last time he was in the ring?

I think they'll turn him face in the near future.
 
He has been booked badly since the shield split and his character work has been inconsistent (at least he has a character though). But the way I did it he's not getting super booking. He wins it on a cash in and loses the next month.

Not just that . It looks like they are giving him the foley/hardy wwe story
 
I'll play devil's advocate here. How much sense would it make for him to come back and all of a sudden love the fans and be a face after being booed and called a weak champion the last time he was in the ring?

I think they'll turn him face in the near future.

Hate to do it again, (ah who am i kidding? No I dont) but in a company where Roman is a three time WWE champion, making sense shouldn't really mean much.
 
Hate to do it again, (ah who am i kidding? No I dont) but in a company where Roman is a three time WWE champion, making sense shouldn't really mean much.

This might surprise you, but I agree that making Reigns a 3 time champion already didn't make sense. As much as I loved the ending to TLC and the night after, I would have rather them wait until WM to have him win the title for the first time and roll with the tweener booking (or full blown heel turn).
 
They could really spark some interest next week. Rollins comes out, beats down Reigns or whomever with a chair.....Cena's music hits and he comes out for the save.....only to join in with Rollins on the beatdown.
 
They could really spark some interest next week. Rollins comes out, beats down Reigns or whomever with a chair.....Cena's music hits and he comes out for the save.....only to join in with Rollins on the beatdown.

Hope of a Cena heel turn springs eternal.
 
Did I read correctly that Ambrose is getting horrible booking? There's been some incredibly stupid stuff posted in these three threads, but that kind of thinking belongs only in the football forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Wonder if Shane's "Main event of Wrestlemania" line was to let fans know that Rollins/Reigns was the original plan.
 

VN Store



Back
Top