Oh, okay, its on the CNN blog. Yeah, its part of the tug of war over who can be in the courtroom and basically warning everyone not to talk to the other side, or its witnesses or supporters.
State's opening was weak - I mean 30 something minutes - weak opening. It was just a play to emotions with no facts. I understand you want to play to their emotions if you are the State, but they presented nothing of substance. Plus the way the State's opening guy focused in on Zimmerman's gun was just bizarre considering one of the jurors had a carry permit and another's husband has guns.
The defense wasn't much better. They started with a knock-knock joke. There must be a bunch of bad lawyers down in Fl
Tracy Martin has accepted no responsibility for his son's behavior, and he has never withdrawn one word of his declarations that Zimmerman murdered his son in cold blood. The man does not appear to be any where close to right in the head.
The State is trying to argue that Zimmerman's state of mind was hostile. It might score a few debating points, but the defense did well playing the dispatch recording moment by moment during examination of the police dispatcher. The tone of Zimmerman's voice was very tranquil, with no hint of aggression. The recording just does not show a man driven by emotion to commit murder. Of course, we do not know how he sounds on the recordings of his other calls or if the judge will admit them into evidence.
The State is trying to argue that Zimmerman's state of mind was hostile. It might score a few debating points, but the defense did well playing the dispatch recording moment by moment during examination of the police dispatcher. The tone of Zimmerman's voice was very tranquil, with no hint of aggression. The recording just does not show a man driven by emotion to commit murder. Of course, we do not know how he sounds on the recordings of his other calls or if the judge will admit them into evidence.
You just can't justify charging Zimmerman with second degree murder based on the evidence.
Thanks volmain. I'm at work so no access to a tv. I appreciate the updates and your opinions on the trial.
I thought that was obvious which is why I was confused as to why the prosecution charged him with murder. I hope FL is not one of those BS states where the prosecution can overcharge but the jury can convict on a lesser charge that was not brought forth/tried by the prosecutors.
Of murder? Where are you getting this notion from?
Of murder?