While many of you want to believe that if someone doesn't advocate immediate change they must be a fan of the current coach, it simply isn't true.
I'm a fan of the Big Orange and realize that often when a coaching change is made it leads to years of more mediocrity. Stability doesn't guarantee success but having 5 (6 if we end up with an interim)coaches inside of 12 seasons isn't going to make any coach or recruit want to come here. This is what most are missing.
Unlike most of you I can't read the future and know that CBJ will fail or be successful. However stability of the program is more important to long term success than screaming for your Big Mac today.
and no coach want's to come to a program completely devoid of talent, with a full reclamation project needed, understanding that it needs to be done in 3 years max. players don't want to play for a program that isn't going to win, and help them with their future goals past college. afterall, at this level, the level we think we should be competing at, we're not recruiting players that's goals are to be guidance counselors after graduation.
lastly, over the last 5 years, coaching turnover is just a way of life in college football. just last year alone, there was a 30% turnover rate at the head coach position in D1 level (52 positions in all, in a single year)...and over the past 5 years, coaching turnover is up over 50% over the previous 10 years.
stability be damned. FL hired a coach and won the east in both of his first years. GA hired a new coach and is ranked 3rd in the country in the 2nd year. UCF hired a coach after going winless just 3 years ago, and is now undefeated. Washington hired a coach and in year two won the conf and made the play off.
not every single coaching change has to result in equal to, or a decline in, performance.