BeecherVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2008
- Messages
- 39,116
- Likes
- 14,439
Then I'll agree on that. Maybe should have used it at some point, but for whatever reason it was determined that it wouldn't have necessarily helped. Maybe CRB was comfortable with the matchups that were on the floor or is more confident in his player's conditioning and ability to take instructions on the fly. Maybe he's using it as a teaching moment. He has his reasons and I know less than he does as far as what strategies are appropriate for the situations.
I've been paying attention after time outs have been burned to stop runs. I've not seen a lot of evidence that it works and it won't surprise me if it's been studied and the conclusion is that there is no correlation between stopping runs with time outs as opposed to playing through them. Using them in the 2nd half certainly gives up a little bit of an advantage as opposed to saving them.
There was one other stoppage. Grant Williams foul at 9:47 mark. But still, one stop in play in 9 minutes is brutal.
Maybe more brutal for the fans than the players. Road game, tough opponent, the game didn't slip away. TN rarely has games out of reach anymore. It's maybe not happened since at Vandy a year or two ago. If it's not been that long, it's certainly now the exception. These Barnes coached teams never give up.
Maybe more brutal for the fans than the players. Road game, tough opponent, the game didn't slip away. TN rarely has games out of reach anymore. It's maybe not happened since at Vandy a year or two ago. If it's not been that long, it's certainly now the exception. These Barnes coached teams never give up.
Or maybe it was just a bad coaching move? :dunno:
Not everything needs an explanation. Coaches are fallible. Barnes isn't above reproach. He isn't perfect. Just a bad decision that maybe cost them the game. Maybe it didn't. Just no excuse to take a TO to the half when our guys were so tired and struggling, and we had three guys waiting at the table to check in.
Maybe so. But the chronic Barnes bashers fixate on every single aspect that didn't play out perfectly. He's doing a terrific job and several on here will never admit that.
I'm a Barnes supporter but you seem to think nobody can even remotely question anything that he does.
Stop trying to rationalize it. Mizzou had no one in foul trouble at the time and they had all the momentum having erased an 8 point deficit. Call the dang TO.
This. Every time I think Bone starts to " get it" , he has a game like he did last night. Therefore, he is not an elite PG and we will always be inconsistent based on Bones, as well as the other guards play. We need Simons so bad next year to make this an " elite" team.
Barnes has his philosophy. Those are possible reasons for his strategy. TOs don't magically flip the momentum. TN played even through the first half as an underdog on the road.
I don't remember crowds being settled down after momentum killing time outs are called.
You just can't admit that he makes mistakes. Your infallible view of him is just as ridiculous as those who think every decision he makes is a fireable offense.
No, TOs don't magically flip momentum. But they do allow your guys to physically rest and substitutions to be made. That isn't debatable. And sometimes they do shift (or at least slow down) momentum the same way a technical foul does.
It's not a mistake. It's a philosophy and EVERY TIME the opponent goes on a run certain posters start advocating that a TO will cure it. I don't counter every time that happens. My opinion is that it's not a flawed philosophy being used. For that I get attacked.
Not saying you're wrong, but Barnes is responsible for the poor planning and lack of adjustments that led to those players going 2-20.