XknoxvolsX
The only people who dislike winners are losers!
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2019
- Messages
- 1,154
- Likes
- 1,076
So you’re saying he sucks as an AD?
“It could continue to go down” was yours. I’ve long ago conceded that Fulmer has been impressive making the big decisions. Guess I can be talked out of it.
Got into semi-trouble last season visiting with the OL. Doubt he does a repeat. And Fulmer picked Pruitt. If Pruitt ain’t the guy, Fulmer sucked at the decision.No. I think that comment came from a poster talking about the correct change at the time was to fire Fulmer. He went on to say that if Fulmer hadn’t been fired and the correct change had been made people would be questioning it today if Fulmer had continued to lose.
I was talking about Pruitt not being the coach to bring this team to SEC champs and national champs contention. Nothing about Fulmer. I will say however I wish he had came back to work with O line recruit and coach. Since he has been gone the o line has been pathetic most years.
Got into semi-trouble last season visiting with the OL. Doubt he does a repeat. And Fulmer picked Pruitt. If Pruitt ain’t the guy, Fulmer sucked at the decision.
Was Bob Stoops an established coach? Kirby? Going down a different road here.That is the problem as the AD he can’t help coaching in any sport.
I also wouldn’t say he sucked ar his decision in fact outside of Hamilton I don’t blame any of the AD including Curry. Very few good established coach will not come here.
When did Fulmer and Dabo cross paths as head coaches?No and neither was Dabo. Everyone realizes that if Fulmer had taken the Clemson job Dabo said he would be interesting in talking to UT.
I only said that no big coach would come here because they have tried a few and that has been hang up for fans.
Dabo was never on our radar. No coordinator experience even. And Fulmer was never an option for Clemson...not even a consideration.No and neither was Dabo. Everyone realizes that if Fulmer had taken the Clemson job Dabo said he would be interesting in talking to UT.
I only said that no big coach would come here because they have tried a few and that has been hang up for fans.
Exactly. Kiffin had to mesh an offensive line together with two walk-ons since Fulmer left the cupboard bare. He also developed Crompton into a serving of chicken salad.Just because his replacements have not fared better does not mean Fulmer's firing was not justified!
If you really want to go that directions, all you have to do is look back at the end of his tenure and realize he is the reason the program is in the shape and situation it is, in!
Fulmer would have never lost like we have besides if he had a couple of more losing season he could have been fired. The supposedly correct change has turned into a complete disaster and it could continue to go down.
Dabo was never on our radar. No coordinator experience even. And Fulmer was never an option for Clemson...not even a consideration.
There is NO evidence that we would have been any better off if we had kept Fulmer. After 2005 he never showed the capacity to bring the program back without Cutcliffe.
Using your logic Fulmer may have never been head coach at. UT. Majors won 3 SEC championships in his last 6 years. Fulmer won zero in his last 6 years and had two losing seasons. Spurrier’s return to USC in 2005 moved the Vols from the traditional 2nd or third team in the East to the 4th team in the East. The downward spiral started with Fulmer.
There is NO evidence that we would have been any better off if we had kept Fulmer. After 2005 he never showed the capacity to bring the program back without Cutcliffe.
Using your logic Fulmer may have never been head coach at. UT. Majors won 3 SEC championships in his last 6 years. Fulmer won zero in his last 6 years and had two losing seasons. Spurrier’s return to USC in 2005 moved the Vols from the traditional 2nd or third team in the East to the 4th team in the East. The downward spiral started with Fulmer.
Link something or it’s fiction. General accepted story is that the AD was looking for a reason to keep Dabo from the very beginning and never interviewed anyone else.Yes. You see I knew you guys didn’t know much about Tennessee recent history. Tommy Bowden was fired at Clemson after six games of the 08 season. Dabo was hired as interim head coach for the remaining 08 season. When Fulmer was fired Clemson did talk to Fulmer and was interested in hiring him. Dabo stated during this time if Fulmer was named head coach he would interested in talking with UT as he was ready to be a head coach. As it turned out Fulmer turned Clemson down because he had no interest in leaving East Tennessee and Dabo was named head coach of Clemson.
Link something or it’s fiction. General accepted story is that the AD was looking for a reason to keep Dabo from the very beginning and never interviewed anyone else.
If true, then thanks for sharing.I’ll have to look but I can promise this my father has been a donor since 1970 I have been a donor since 1993. The two of us along with other donors were going to donate to Clemson if Fulmer was hired.
You are right the AD did want Dabo the great fans wanted an established coach. See who won that one and who lost. Tennessee all around.
Never heard this story. Are you sure it was 2008 when Clemson approached Fulmer? Seems like would have done it in 2010 since that after Clemson went 6-7 and fans were upset.Yes. You see I knew you guys didn’t know much about Tennessee recent history. Tommy Bowden was fired at Clemson after six games of the 08 season. Dabo was hired as interim head coach for the remaining 08 season. When Fulmer was fired Clemson did talk to Fulmer and was interested in hiring him. Dabo stated during this time if Fulmer was named head coach he would interested in talking with UT as he was ready to be a head coach. As it turned out Fulmer turned Clemson down because he had no interest in leaving East Tennessee and Dabo was named head coach of Clemson.
If true, then thanks for sharing.
Never heard this story. Are you sure it was 2008 when Clemson approached Fulmer? Seems like would have done it in 2010 since that after Clemson went 6-7 and fans were upset.
Still not sure because I think Fulmer would have jumped at the chance. Rode the elevator up with Vicky and one daughter before the Wyoming game and she stated he would be coaching again very soon.
Never heard this story. Are you sure it was 2008 when Clemson approached Fulmer? Seems like would have done it in 2010 since that after Clemson went 6-7 and fans were upset.
Still not sure because I think Fulmer would have jumped at the chance. Rode the elevator up with Vicky and one daughter before the Wyoming game and she stated he would be coaching again very soon.
There is NO evidence that we would have been any better off if we had kept Fulmer. After 2005 he never showed the capacity to bring the program back without Cutcliffe.
Using your logic Fulmer may have never been head coach at. UT. Majors won 3 SEC championships in his last 6 years. Fulmer won zero in his last 6 years and had two losing seasons. Spurrier’s return to USC in 2005 moved the Vols from the traditional 2nd or third team in the East to the 4th team in the East. The downward spiral started with Fulmer.
Fulmer would probably went 3-9 in 2009.