volinbama256
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2010
- Messages
- 12,872
- Likes
- 12,946
Brown has the same wingspan as Felix. He isn’t the athlete that Felix or Rubin are, but I don’t see any reason he can’t play the 5. And cool thing about him is his skill give him the flexibility to play 4 like we saw most of this year.
I think Haralson is a big key to this team. If he can play the 4 and be defensively good and do the little things required of the 4 position in a Rick Barnes offense (screening) it can unlock so much for us.
He needs to be a very willing and good screener, period. If he doesn’t go out there and do it, my expectation is he actually gets benched for Brown.
good comments. i do think lundblade has a chaz like release - it's gone before you can react to play defense once he gets it. and he is so accurate.A few things I noticed watching the clips of the guys incoming.
1. Haralson was actually very good at setting screens and then rolling to the basket out of them, he can dribble/drive and create for himself but so often because ND was full of lethal shooters he would set screens to help them get open and quite a few of his easy dunks came from his man overhelping on the shooter as he rolled
2. Lundblade is amazing at using screens and with his height he can shoot over anyone that tries to dip under them. He also has a very quick release. He's not a "stand and wait" shooter at all, constantly moving and using screens to get his looks. As long as he can defend well enough I think he'll find plenty of minutes
I'm most interested in Lue of all the incoming guys. I'm curious if he's a true 6'9" guy or not, after Dunbar being so grossly over listed I'm weary of small school "bigs" now Conference USA is a step above the CAA though. But listed height aside, I'm curious if Lue is a true big or more of a 3 or stretch 4. He took around 33% of his shots from behind the arc and his rebounding is solid but under 6 a game in 68 games. The good news is he's got 2 years, so might be an off the bench guy who can play 3-5 as needed and then in his 2nd year becomes a starter at the 4.
There is also soooo much potential with this freshman class both in size and skillset.
My favorite part is the number of 6'5" and taller players now on the team at 9
I feel like our average height might actually be taller this year even though our max is lower. And if we get the juco kid we'll even have our 7 foot unicorn.A few things I noticed watching the clips of the guys incoming.
1. Haralson was actually very good at setting screens and then rolling to the basket out of them, he can dribble/drive and create for himself but so often because ND was full of lethal shooters he would set screens to help them get open and quite a few of his easy dunks came from his man overhelping on the shooter as he rolled
2. Lundblade is amazing at using screens and with his height he can shoot over anyone that tries to dip under them. He also has a very quick release. He's not a "stand and wait" shooter at all, constantly moving and using screens to get his looks. As long as he can defend well enough I think he'll find plenty of minutes
I'm most interested in Lue of all the incoming guys. I'm curious if he's a true 6'9" guy or not, after Dunbar being so grossly over listed I'm weary of small school "bigs" now Conference USA is a step above the CAA though. But listed height aside, I'm curious if Lue is a true big or more of a 3 or stretch 4. He took around 33% of his shots from behind the arc and his rebounding is solid but under 6 a game in 68 games. The good news is he's got 2 years, so might be an off the bench guy who can play 3-5 as needed and then in his 2nd year becomes a starter at the 4.
There is also soooo much potential with this freshman class both in size and skillset.
My favorite part is the number of 6'5" and taller players now on the team at 9
Bishop and his mom seem so salty about getting pushed out.
He wasn't forced out. He thought he could get more money by going somewhere else, and it's likely he was right.Not to defend them, but I do get how it's tough on players who may have wanted to stay, to get forced out and then hear about upgrades. It's the way it is, but the human side of me gets how one could be salty about it. It is what needed to happen, and I'd be salty too if I was gonna have to play for Maryland next season.
Lundblade should be really good coming off the floppy action that Barnes liked to run. Kinda surprised we didn't see Ament more in that role last season. 6"10" coming off that curl would have been really hard to defend.A few things I noticed watching the clips of the guys incoming.
1. Haralson was actually very good at setting screens and then rolling to the basket out of them, he can dribble/drive and create for himself but so often because ND was full of lethal shooters he would set screens to help them get open and quite a few of his easy dunks came from his man overhelping on the shooter as he rolled
2. Lundblade is amazing at using screens and with his height he can shoot over anyone that tries to dip under them. He also has a very quick release. He's not a "stand and wait" shooter at all, constantly moving and using screens to get his looks. As long as he can defend well enough I think he'll find plenty of minutes
I'm most interested in Lue of all the incoming guys. I'm curious if he's a true 6'9" guy or not, after Dunbar being so grossly over listed I'm weary of small school "bigs" now Conference USA is a step above the CAA though. But listed height aside, I'm curious if Lue is a true big or more of a 3 or stretch 4. He took around 33% of his shots from behind the arc and his rebounding is solid but under 6 a game in 68 games. The good news is he's got 2 years, so might be an off the bench guy who can play 3-5 as needed and then in his 2nd year becomes a starter at the 4.
There is also soooo much potential with this freshman class both in size and skillset.
My favorite part is the number of 6'5" and taller players now on the team at 9
Yes, this is an inconvenient truth for some. Had we landed Rice or McKneely last offseason, Bishop Boswell's impact and opportunity are much less and he's transferring to UAB for $50k this year instead of Maryland for $1.5 mil (or whatever he's making).BIshop hustled and gave us more than I expected. He however played out necessity. I don’t think he would have had much of a role based on who we brought in .
That's fine. He and his family can have fun watching us play in the NCAA tournament from the couch next March.There is a chasm between what Bishop and his family believe his offensive ceiling/ability is, and what Barnes and staff believe it is.
This is not weird, uncommon or unique. Plenty of players and parents are this way. It’s normal.
The part that is bad form is to go on social and do crap like this. In only reflects poorly on them.
Yep. The 2 spot was by far the weakness of this team, esplecially after the hat we’d gotten out of it the previous two years.Yes, this is an inconvenient truth for some. Had we landed Rice or McKneely last offseason, Bishop Boswell's impact and opportunity are much less and he's transferring to UAB for $50k this year instead of Maryland for $1.5 mil (or whatever he's making).
His jump in production was as much born out of necessity meeting opportunity as it was a jump in ability. To expect another huge jump could be fool's gold.
Lundblade should be really good coming off the floppy action that Barnes liked to run. Kinda surprised we didn't see Ament more in that role last season. 6"10" coming off that curl would have been really hard to defend.
