There's an old critique of event-oriented evangelistic spectacles that "what you win them
with is what you win them
to."
Last spring, CKC communicated to her new recruiting staff what she was looking for. Coach Lazo--a terrific personality with the SEC recruiting experience that CKC didn't have--went out and landed some of the top talent that matched the profile, in character, preferred playing style, on court capabilities, speed, length, etc. Looked like a dream team.
I've wondered in retrospect if where we missed on the "personal resiliency & grit" factor might have happened in the sales pitch... if maybe they were "sold" on a Tennessee Lady Vol experience, and a vision of what they could achieve by their sheer accumulation of talent?
I also wonder if CKC might have become more concerned with the question (also beyond her experience) of how that much individual talent could be unified into a close team while sharing so much playing time? I wonder if there might have been an (over-?) emphasis on "what y'all can achieve together" to encourage that team building.
For whatever reason, the starkest difference between now and this time last year appears to be the sales pitch.
The
(surprisingly controversial) chip-on-the-shoulder internal motivation has been added to the LV character rubric. The opportunity to
represent the Lady Vols was
anti-sold this year. You've gotta want to prove who
you are, and do whatever it takes to prove that you've
earned the right to play on this stage.
-----
Yeah... I don't think there was a lot of "hang another banner and hang with Candace" in the sales pitch this year.