10 year show cause/NCAA, Tyndall discussion (merged)

Here ya go SD. And all are still playing. So 18 is better than 2

List of NBA players new Tennessee coach Rick Barnes had at Texas

How in the world did LaBron James and Kobe Bryant ever make it to the NBA w/o Barnes?

Tell us what Barnes did that made each of the players who played at Texas become NBA worthy? All of those players made the NBA because of their individual talent and Barnes had nothing to do with it! Barnes system is vanilla as blacktop bb!

Kenneth Faried and J. Richardson have the individual talent to be where they are today, however, it was the system that they played in that helped to expose their qualities.
 
It appears to be a Tyndall love fest for some, because they clearly only care about him and his academy, not the University or basketball program.

I'm sure that you are gonna be extremely excited about the 2017 Barnes recruits! How many of them and the `16 recruits will Barnes put in the NBA?
 
How in the world did LaBron James and Kobe Bryant ever make it to the NBA w/o Barnes?

Tell us what Barnes did that made each of the players who played at Texas become NBA worthy? All of those players made the NBA because of their individual talent and Barnes had nothing to do with it! Barnes system is vanilla as blacktop bb!

Kenneth Faried and J. Richardson have the individual talent to be where they are today, however, it was the system that they played in that helped to expose their qualities.

Typical. When it's any coach other than Tyndall "they didn't have anything to do with it!" but with Tyndall it's "of course it was his system! He's the God of all coaches!" You're pathetic. Enjoy kissing his ass as he watches college basketball for the rest of his life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
How in the world did LaBron James and Kobe Bryant ever make it to the NBA w/o Barnes?

Tell us what Barnes did that made each of the players who played at Texas become NBA worthy? All of those players made the NBA because of their individual talent and Barnes had nothing to do with it! Barnes system is vanilla as blacktop bb!

Kenneth Faried and J. Richardson have the individual talent to be where they are today, however, it was the system that they played in that helped to expose their qualities.

Got an agenda do ya?
U R Reeeediclous!!!
 
Typical. When it's any coach other than Tyndall "they didn't have anything to do with it!" but with Tyndall it's "of course it was his system! He's the God of all coaches!" You're pathetic. Enjoy kissing his ass as he watches college basketball for the rest of his life.

I already said that Faried and Richardson have the talent to be in the NBA, just like the guys who played at Texas. The only difference is the system that I've mentioned here did expose that talent to NBA scouts more. The ones from Texas didn't have a system so much as their individual talents.

I wouldn't be so sure about your prediction about Tyndall, if I were you!
 
I already said that Faried and Richardson have the talent to be in the NBA, just like the guys who played at Texas. The only difference is the system that I've mentioned here did expose that talent to NBA scouts more. The ones from Texas didn't have a system so much as their individual talents.

I wouldn't be so sure about your prediction about Tyndall, if I were you!

Oh I'm completely sure. And unless you or your other half can produce any physical proof of an appeal or anything, then you definitely won't change my mind. You probably won't anyway, but you'd at least have chance. But since neither of you have produced it in over 2 months, it's quite clear you have nothing. And since no media sources of said anything other than "He appeared in front of the committee", they obviously don't think anything is going to happen either. But hold your breath. Maybe it'll make you actually think things through.
 
I already said that Faried and Richardson have the talent to be in the NBA, just like the guys who played at Texas. The only difference is the system that I've mentioned here did expose that talent to NBA scouts more. The ones from Texas didn't have a system so much as their individual talents.

I wouldn't be so sure about your prediction about Tyndall, if I were you!

So Richardson having a great 2014 NCAAT had nothing to do with the NBA scouts taking notice? If it wasn't for Donnie Ball (without an appearance in a post SECT tourney) Josh would be selling insurance today? I did not know that.
 
I already said that Faried and Richardson have the talent to be in the NBA, just like the guys who played at Texas. The only difference is the system that I've mentioned here did expose that talent to NBA scouts more. The ones from Texas didn't have a system so much as their individual talents.

I wouldn't be so sure about your prediction about Tyndall, if I were you!

You're the dumbest poster on this site, and that's saying a ton. What you said makes absolutely no sense at all.
 
So Richardson having a great 2014 NCAAT had nothing to do with the NBA scouts taking notice? If it wasn't for Donnie Ball (without an appearance in a post SECT tourney) Josh would be selling insurance today? I did not know that.

Oh don't you know, it was Tyndall's "system" that got him in the NBA. But not Barnes' "system" at Texas because apparently he had no "system".
 
Typical, instead of answering any questions you go straight to a nonsensical statement! Shows that you have no answers.
There really are no answers for your asinine BS.
How do you dream this stuff up? Then you act as if you've stated a fact.
Angel dust or crack.
 
Oh I'm completely sure. And unless you or your other half can produce any physical proof of an appeal or anything, then you definitely won't change my mind. You probably won't anyway, but you'd at least have chance. But since neither of you have produced it in over 2 months, it's quite clear you have nothing. And since no media sources of said anything other than "He appeared in front of the committee", they obviously don't think anything is going to happen either. But hold your breath. Maybe it'll make you actually think things through.

You probably have not heard of the federal court system, but there is such a system and in case the plaintiff is not satisfied by the appeals board then I believe that he has that as a further recourse.
 
There really are no answers for your asinine BS.
How do you dream this stuff up? Then you act as if you've stated a fact.
Angel dust or crack.

I regret having to ignore your personal insults, however, if another one should occur, then I will have no further recourse.
 
You probably have not heard of the federal court system, but there is such a system and in case the plaintiff is not satisfied by the appeals board then I believe that he has that as a further recourse.

Yep. And those that refused to cooperate and give the NCAA information (which happened, despite what SD will tell you. Read the whole document and you'll see for yourself what I'm talking about) will be forced to give information which has a great possibility of damning your idol even more.
 
You probably have not heard of the federal court system, but there is such a system and in case the plaintiff is not satisfied by the appeals board then I believe that he has that as a further recourse.

Ron-Burgundy-Say-What-Anchorman-2.gif
 
Yep. And those that refused to cooperate and give the NCAA information (which happened, despite what SD will tell you. Read the whole document and you'll see for yourself what I'm talking about) will be forced to give information which has a great possibility of damning your idol even more.

Whatever it takes. I look forward to have everything put on the table. What does CDT have to lose that he would lose without getting it all out there. I have heard him talk and he feels confident that he has been unfairly judged. I want to know the complete story.

If he does get exonerated and re-instated, then will you accept him and ask for forgiveness for having doubts?
 
Whatever it takes. I look forward to have everything put on the table. What does CDT have to lose that he would lose without getting it all out there. I have heard him talk and he feels confident that he has been unfairly judged. I want to know the complete story.

If he does get exonerated and re-instated, then will you accept him and ask for forgiveness for having doubts?

Exonerated? There you go again.
He could possibly get his aggravated offense reduced to the 5 year minimum. Doubt very seriously if that happens.
Exonerated? give us a break.
 
Whatever it takes. I look forward to have everything put on the table. What does CDT have to lose that he would lose without getting it all out there. I have heard him talk and he feels confident that he has been unfairly judged. I want to know the complete story.

If he does get exonerated and re-instated, then will you accept him and ask for forgiveness for having doubts?

And that's what I've been saying the whole time. The only reason he's doing this is because he has nothing to lose. As I've said numerous times:

1. If he doesn't appeal, he has a 10 year show-cause.
2. If he does appeal and loses, he still has a 10 year show-cause.
3. He appeals and by some miracle (or the opinion of people as crazy as you and SD) he wins, he gets it reduced.

It's a no-lose situation for him. I just don't see it having any substantial results.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Whatever it takes. I look forward to have everything put on the table. What does CDT have to lose that he would lose without getting it all out there. I have heard him talk and he feels confident that he has been unfairly judged. I want to know the complete story.

If he does get exonerated and re-instated, then will you accept him and ask for forgiveness for having doubts?

This part is pure fantasy. There's no way he doesn't come out with some sort of show cause, and at best it will be about 3-5 years.

That's what you can't seem to get through your thick skull SeniorBuzz; his best case scenario is a reduced show cause. There will be no full exoneration.
 
And that's what I've been saying the whole time. The only reason he's doing this is because he has nothing to lose. As I've said numerous times:

1. If he doesn't appeal, he has a 10 year show-cause.
2. If he does appeal and loses, he still has a 10 year show-cause.
3. He appeals and by some miracle (or the opinion of people as crazy as you and SD) he wins, he gets it reduced.

It's a no-lose situation for him. I just don't see it having any substantial results.

I guess that this is exactly what I expected you to say. If it is found that there is no evidence to prove that he did anything to promote academic fraud and therefore his show-cause penalty is overturned then you will still contend that he is guilty. If that happens then you will be the one who is in the wrong and it won't matter what you think.
 
I guess that this is exactly what I expected you to say. If it is found that there is no evidence to prove that he did anything to promote academic fraud and therefore his show-cause penalty is overturned then you will still contend that he is guilty. If that happens then you will be the one who is in the wrong and it won't matter what you think.

And if the show cause is upheld in any way, you won't admit you were wrong at all and will continue to whine that he is innocent.

Stop projecting SeniorBuzz.
 

VN Store



Back
Top