fbcgovols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 407
- Likes
- 0
you should be fine with all those 3-stars then....good luck!This is beyond hilarious....do you even think before you post...
Weren't you giving us crap over Christian Harris about what a low rated prospect he was projected to be? Before you try to dance around this....the plain and simple answer to that question is yes you were
Hilarious...lol: You're trolling is so absurd you can't even keep up with it yourself
Newspaper clippings and Rivals stars don't mean squat on the field.....Not everyone is suckered in by the rating system.The star rankings are a guidebook based on various criteria and by no means definite--just like the draft. ......sour grapes.
you should be fine with all those 3-stars then....good luck!
Hunter Long will see the field long before Nash Nance....if he ever does.
btw, Harris dropped out of the GA top 75....probably a 2-star now. But remember those star thingys don't mean squat.
Posted via VolNation MobileSo star ratings don't mean anything when they don't bode well for a UGA commit but they are unquestionable when it comes to UT commits?
This is why you're such a joke...you say whatever you need to say to back up your BS...even if you contradict your own previous postings in the process
BTW...
1.) Harris is still a 3 star according to every recruiting agency out there...but since when have facts gotten in your way?
2.) If having less 4*'s than UGA is a problem for us then why do we keep embarrassing you all on the field every year (51-33, 35-13, 45-19)?
you should be fine with all those 3-stars then....good luck!
Hunter Long will see the field long before Nash Nance....if he ever does.
btw, Harris dropped out of the GA top 75....probably a 2-star now. But remember those star thingys don't mean squat.
2.) If having less 4*'s than UGA is a problem for us then why do we keep embarrassing you all on the field every year (51-33, 35-13, 45-19)?[/QUOTE]
you were just better than us on those 3 occasions....but we're still 6-4 this decade. soon to be 7-4. you have a few more months to enjoy yourselves.
2.) If having less 4*'s than UGA is a problem for us then why do we keep embarrassing you all on the field every year (51-33, 35-13, 45-19)?[/QUOTE]
you were just better than us on those 3 occasions....but we're still 6-4 this decade. soon to be 7-4. you have a few more months to enjoy yourselves.
2.) If having less 4*'s than UGA is a problem for us then why do we keep embarrassing you all on the field every year (51-33, 35-13, 45-19)?[/QUOTE]
you were just better than us on those 3 occasions....but we're still 6-4 this decade. soon to be 7-4. you have a few more months to enjoy yourselves.
no, im quite certain your better than us. last years score proves it. we don't have a rats chance in hell vs ut.No, no, no....according to you this isn't possible because UGA has more 4* players than we do....or are you back to the "stars and press clippings don't mean anything" stance?
You're really going around in circles aren't you? Poor guy...lol:
You ought to pick one side and stick to it....it's inevitable that you'll come across as an idiot but at least you'll have consistency on your side