The Breakerboy
DBU
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 28,668
- Likes
- 8,885
Hubbs just said he could be wrong about Patterson. Said P. Fort usually knows more than him and P. Fort said he would probably be an EE.
This might sound like a crazy question (probably because it is), but what would be the problem with a 5-receiver set on a few possessions throughout a game? I realize that leaves only 5 blockers and your quarterback (opening up the potential for a blitz and quick pass rush), but then again, there wouldn't be enough coverage in the backfield to handle such a set. If I'm just an idiot for thinking such, then fine, call me out, but with what receivers UT may have available next year, why wouldn't such a scheme work on the occassional down or two?
I wouldn't hurt to try and change things up some. If you have 3 or 4 stud receivers and some need double coverage, a blitz could be dangerous for the defense. The QB would need to know where a quick safety valve is, if needed.This might sound like a crazy question (probably because it is), but what would be the problem with a 5-receiver set on a few possessions throughout a game? I realize that leaves only 5 blockers and your quarterback (opening up the potential for a blitz and quick pass rush), but then again, there wouldn't be enough coverage in the backfield to handle such a set. If I'm just an idiot for thinking such, then fine, call me out, but with what receivers UT may have available next year, why wouldn't such a scheme work on the occassional down or two?