Look, restating your opinion in length and including a bunch of other names irrelevant to the actual point doesn't make it any more right, or any less wrong.
Bradshaw committed to Tennessee in January of 2002, a full 6 months before Humphrey committed to Florida. CJ Watson and Thaddeus Holden were the only two PGs on the roster at the time, with Holden being a senior. Jordan Howell didn't enter the equation until May of 2003 when Harrick was fired at UGA, 14 months after Bradshaw committed to Tennessee, and 10 months after Humphrey committed to Florida. Tennessee had no clue at the time of the alleged Humphrey/Bradshaw argument that Howell would even become available, so he is irrelevant to the story.
Hindsight is 20/20, and people like yourself, who didn't like Bradshaw, will inevitably fight tooth and nail to the grave that he "took Lee Humphrey's scholarship." It's just not as simple as that. Bradshaw committed so early in the process, and long before most anyone outside of Blount County knew who Lee Humphrey was. Were Memphis connections a motivation in landing Dane? Sure, but it's not like he was considered chopped liver either. Top 150 player who had started at PG for a couole state championship winning teams is nothing to turn your back on. And if you remember, Peterson took the first to commit between him and Dez Whittingham (?) from Texas. So, if it hadn't been Dane, it likely would have been Whittingham.
And to say that Lee Humphrey would have likely saved Buzz Peterson's job is both pure speculation, and completely unfounded. If CJ Watson, Chris Lofton, and JuJuan Smith couldn't save it, an average role player with half the shot Lofton had wasn't likely to either. On that same subject, where does Humphrey fit in on that team? Are you going to start him over Lofton at SG, or over Smith at SF?
We can agree to disagree about the Bradshaw/Humphrey scholarship debate.