TriedAndTrueVOL
UT VOL Connoisseur
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 6,085
- Likes
- 2,578
Technically that's not true. In his case it certainly was true but not by the letter of the law.
If an athlete plays 2 or more sports and is on scholarship, he must be on scholarship for the higher revenue sport. This will almost always be football, but i suppose it is possible for it to not be. The hierarchy is determined by revenue though, which isn't widely known.
Edit*- Someone mentioned Kentucky and that along with Kansas, if the football teams were REALLY bad could be examples. Also places like Villanova could be examples.
He was asking about Ellington. At South Carolina, football is the higher revenue sport so he had to count in football. So, technically speaking, it is absolutely true in Ellington's case. I am familiar with the rule. :hi: