Everyone's 40 is timed in a straight line on track so the kid is fast.
There is more to football than just being fast, trust in the coaches and wish the kid well wherever he goes.
I think it's hilarious that LV is so hell-bent on dragging TG (top ten 5* player) through the dirt yet he is imploring as to why we (and everyone else) haven't offered NC, 0* local running back.
I suppose when the NFL requires guys to run their 40 in full pads and a helmet, we'll know who's speed actually translates well to the field.
It's just shocking to me that all those guys running those 4.3s-4.5s in all those events and combines(including the NFL) around the country don't realize their speed is kind of fake and in no way translates to being a fast football player.
Or does that just go for the white RB from Knoxville?lol:
Leonard Scott- only asset was as a kick returner where he could get a running start. He was one of the fastest men in the world after he graduated, and he did very little his last few years for football at UT. It helps, but just because you are fast doesn't mean you are great at football.
Leonard Scott did not end up being much of a WR at all at Tennessee. The thing that gets me is I'm not sure why that should surprise anyone as he was a RB his JR and SR year in HS and only averaged about 800 yards a year. Cottrell plays RB not WR. Add to that his 2000 yards last year and I don't see much being similar at all.
I wasn't trying to compare their accomplishments or them, as players. It is just one example where speed does not equal a good football player. It is not that difficult. Just like on the other end with slower 40 times- Jerry Rice, Emmitt Smith, Richard Sherman, Joe Haden, etc. All of them had slower times for their positions and have succeeded.
Cottrell may be successful, but just because he runs a sub 4.4 doesn't mean he will succeed automatically.
"He is a really good athlete and is a smart football player. Size is the concern that many schools have with him. I know Air Force has offered as has VMI, and Austin Peay. Cottrell is 5-10, 185 pounds."
-Hubbs
After running the 4.36 40 at Duke, their coaching staff is still going to evaluate him.
Size comment is a joke. He's closer to 5'11" anyways but that is good size for a rising Sr RB with his speed."He is a really good athlete and is a smart football player. Size is the concern that many schools have with him. I know Air Force has offered as has VMI, and Austin Peay. Cottrell is 5-10, 185 pounds."
-Hubbs
After running the 4.36 40 at Duke, their coaching staff is still going to evaluate him.
In a lot of cases I am sure that would be accurate. Why I question it in this case is simply because he has elite speed AND his stats equal that of an elite talent ON the football field. 2000 yards in a season and 15YPC is no joke in any classification of football.
Everyone is arguing whether he is fast or not is insane. The timed runs show that he is fast. The main point of contention should be, is he an elite football player. His offer list says no. He camped at Duke and left without an offer.
"He is a really good athlete and is a smart football player. Size is the concern that many schools have with him. I know Air Force has offered as has VMI, and Austin Peay. Cottrell is 5-10, 185 pounds."
-Hubbs
After running the 4.36 40 at Duke, their coaching staff is still going to evaluate him.
It's not. The problem there would be NC would need ALOT more film of him catching the ball to draw much interest IMO.