To be fair, we said the same thing about Ole Miss and their recruits. eace2:
But if that's how Clemson justifies losing a player to UT, so be it. It's not like UT is a second-rate school with sub-par facilities in the middle of nowhere. Anyone with an objective look at things will see that. I can certainly understand how a mom would want her son close, however, UT isn't that far away. Clemson is closer, but it's almost negligible when it comes to travel time. An extra hour isn't far.
We'll see what happens and what Tavien says in the next few weeks. By then we'll know if the interest has some staying power.
Ole Miss has a track record with Eddie Orgeron. Orgeron is Freeze's mentor. And I don't remember a viral post of any 5 star receivers at UT on their OV with a wad of cash, 2 chicks, and mixed drinks. A couple of differences in the schools and the coaches that run them.
Ole Miss has a track record with Eddie Orgeron. Orgeron is Freeze's mentor. And I don't remember a viral post of any 5 star receivers at UT on their OV with a wad of cash, 2 chicks, and mixed drinks. A couple of differences in the schools and the coaches that run them.
Meet a judge in FL a few months ago who was a FSU grad. The man could not have cared less about the SEC, but saw me wearing a Vols hat. Started talking to him about football, and we ended up on the topic of Ole Miss. His thoughts were; how is Ole Miss recruiting like they are? They have to be cheating... It's not just a SEC thing. People notice when teams with zero tradition start rolling in 5 star recruits. Freeze is a great coach, but Ole Miss, outside the campus life and girls, doesn't have tons going for it when it comes to football tradition. It's 110% possible to start something out of nothing, but when it happens people are going to question the success. That's just how life goes.
Your point is well taken but Ole Miss does have a tradition of excellence on the gridiron. You simply have to go back a long, long way. Not as far back as Vandy but a long way nonetheless. From 1950-1965, they were the winningest program in the country, both in terms of absolute wins (128) and winning pct. (.77941). See I-A Winning Percentage 1950-1965.
Your point is well taken but Ole Miss does have a tradition of excellence on the gridiron. You simply have to go back a long, long way. Not as far back as Vandy but a long way nonetheless. From 1950-1965, they were the winningest program in the country, both in terms of absolute wins (128) and winning pct. (.77941). See I-A Winning Percentage 1950-1965.