Catbone
Hit me baby one more time
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 67,188
- Likes
- 65,030
So it's more important to have a high ranking on recruiting stars than to get players who fit your scheme and the coaches' philosophy
I feel like you're so sincere in your efforts to be a good person. I want to give you credit for that.
IMG looked like the better D by far. IMG players taunt Williams after the game, say being a USCe commit is weak sauce (no mention of pumping gas at USC). It was funny ESPN kept showing him at 5'10", he is 5'7" maaaaybe. Kid has heart and determination. If he was 5'10 he would be a top 25 player.
They lost all the most skilled players they had on offense. Few guys here and there on defense. I mean you can try to argue if you want. Just watch. They'll be horrendous. Get back to me then. Well Vandy isn't good but they have a much better defense than Carolina and Carolina won't stop the run. They'll edge Carolina out.
It wasn't tough for Spurrier.
Regardless of facilities Muschamp can still sell more recent success, playing time, and how many defensive players are in the NFL that played under him. Just thought he would be further along in his defensive recruiting at this point.
Usually players are looking for a place they can start. Winning of course is a pull but it’s not the most important thing. Hell Bryant probably could’ve picked a better school than Missouri. They just pretty much guaranteed a starting position. Relationship with coaches and playing time trump everything else for most transfers. Carry on thoughThe US stated he's not playing much. So what does thst tell you