MiramarVol
Sanctified Vol
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2009
- Messages
- 11,946
- Likes
- 11,013
I think we end up 5-7 with a few unknown to us fans highly ranked guys coming in during the season. Also believe a few guys will get big bumps like Antonutti, Harris, Warren, and one of those FL CB's
While it is possible for players to be undervalued and overvalued, in this scenario it's all about fit. And flint is a perfect fit in this defense
Some three star recruits seem to be overlooked. Their film and stats look way too good to actually be a 3 star. Matthew Butler and Jacques Jones come to mind. I do think recruiting services miss a good bit. Tim Jordan may prove to be another example. However, that being said, it has been proven that stars matter. Teams that win recruit at a high level. Bama, Clemson, OSU, FSU etc. If we want to be able to really compete with Bama, or FSU and OSU if we make the playoffs, we have to recruit at a high level. I don't know if Flint is a great player or not, so this has nothing to do with him, but our class that was landing 4 stars earlier is now landing a lot of 3 stars. Hopefully the coaches actually believe these guys are better and aren't missing on higher rated players theyd rather have.
That being said tho, several of our 3 star players are 4 stars on a least one service so in that case, who knows who is right? What we do know is that we don't get the OSU bump like teague did so we won't see Flint jump 100 spots tomorrow
Since I value your opinion, I'm glad to see this.
However, I do believe that a consensus Top 10 finish would be HUGE for our program, perception and buzz wise.
I hope we finish strongly with a lot of 4 stars and maybe one more 5. Go Vols! Beat Tech!
I've pointed it out for a while now but many don't really want to hear it. The recruiting services miss more guys that are 3* and below than they give 4/5* to. BUT... the guys they give 4/5* to are pretty good bets to have the talent to match the rating.
I think there is a temptation to get too caught up in it without considering the purpose of the recruiting sites. They aren't there to be accurate... but to make money off of subscribers. And the reaction of fans assures that they are never really held accountable. A highly rated guy who does poorly is called a bust... it is "his" fault. Sometimes folks will say he was overrated but they don't really question the recruiting site generally. When lower rated guys do well, fans are happy that they were underrated but again don't really question the recruiting sites.
The recruiting sites are paid entertainers. Its good to keep that in view whenever you look at recruits.
OTOH, you're probably aware that there a non-public recruiting firms that specialize in profiling players. Programs pay them for the information. It almost never goes public but has tremendous bearing on which kids are "takes".