Ulysees E. McGill
This season is for you Sweets
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 55,100
- Likes
- 145,541
I kind of see both sides of this. I do think 2016 will go down as an aberration for Shoop, but he has admitted he should have done a better job adapting to the players he had to work with as the season went on.
When you see the kind of injuries we had on the DL (specifically at DT), at some point you've gotta realize a big chunk of your base plays and packages become somewhat useless. In a tough situation like we saw in 2016, a great DC will go to the drawing board, ask "what are the guys I have to play with capable of doing well?" and put in some special packages that only ask guys to do things they're capable of executing.
I get that no DC wants to scrap his system, but when you're giving up 400 rushing yards in back to back games, it should become obvious that your players just can't do what you're asking them to do and that it's time to hit the drawing board.
The fact that Shoop has admitted he should have made more adjustments is very telling, IMO. Self awareness is an important trait for coaches. My big question, looking back on the season, is: why he was so hesitant to adapt and make changes during the season?
Was it just a stubborn belief that his system could trump personnel deficiencies?
Did he not want to sacrifice long-term player development in his system for short term results on the field?
Did he not have faith in the staff around him to help him make the necessary changes?
Was he facing pressure from Butch to stay the course?
We'll likely never know unless a few years down the road a memoir is written, but I'd love to know the answers to those questions.
I believe it was a perfect storm combining all the problems you mentioned. I hope that never happens again.