If that was the case, How did Pat and more or less Holly was able to bring better recruits over a period of time than those schools that you mentioned?
Pat invented women's basketball, schools like UNC and Duke, were not on the huge boom she made the sport, but as yrs went by these acedemic major universities got in the game, Texas, UNC, USC, Purdue, Baylor came along. The game blew up into the biggest female NCAA ( when they included female sports) Tennessee was the Holy Grail with Pat, and The Flag Ship. Holly was first legend player, and near constant right arm of success, where she learned recruiting, and honed her skills doing so. But when a great recruiter doesn't get results fanatics (fans) wants, hateful blame thrown at players, and parents, other school coaches...we probably have lost a look of stability to top recruits, it will take great coaching to raise this program back. We don't offer an elite education, future, like UNC who is starting over after firing a legend coach. That is how, and the difference. Pat coach in a time where she was the game, became a living legend, Holly followed that, with direct link, luster faded,.Duke, UNC, Texas, ND, Baylor, Maryland,did recruit right along with Pat's Last 10 yrs and All Holly's years...so yes, they were recruiting at Pat's level. Along with Geno. NC has knew coach, and gets big recruiting results, an offer from them makes parents, teachers, advisors, pressure recruit to jump at opportunity. Tennessee, not in the modern game...yet.