2020 Presidential Race

All unemployment is down, thanks to Obamas economy. Sadly the damage felt from trumps moves wont be felt for another few years after he's already gone

Oh yeah? What was it Obama said, something like “those jobs aren’t coming back. What magic wand do you have?”
Trump is setting records across the board boy!
 
Something I've heard from some people, even in the media, every since election night 2016, is that Trump didn't get as many votes as Romney. Of course on election night you don't know what the final vote tallies are going to be so you sort of have to wait until the counting is done. I used the numbers from wiki, which they have sourced, to compare the party vote for President from 2012 to 2016. A positive number means the 2016 candidate had more votes for that party than the candidate in 2012. A negative number would say the 2012 candidate had more votes. Trump states have his vote shaded red, Clinton states have her vote shaded blue. Maine gave an electoral vote to Trump (from CD-2) so I shaded Maine yellow. Trump had over 2 million more votes than Romney and Clinton had only around 62 thousand votes less than Obama 2012. It's where the vote differences by state occurred that really changed the outcome of the election in 2016 vs the outcome in 2012. The table is sorted by Trumps state performance compared to Romney. This table has nothing to do with the margin of victory between the two parties, only comparison of the performance of their 2016 candidate vs their 2012 candidate.

There was a lot of analysis after the 2016 election which claimed that Trump flipped a lot of votes in a number of states from blue to red. I think that's true. I think Trump's Texas performance, while he won, may have been adversely impacted by Cruz's refusal to endorse him at the Republican National Convention. As it stands now I think Trump will do a lot better in Texas and other typically red states this time around, including especially Utah. The democrats lost a lot of voters in 2016, for whatever reason, and they were unable to offset that in key states with their "changing demographics" strategy. The blue firewall in the Midwest collapsed in 2016 because voters either switched sides or stayed home. 2020 should be very interesting. jmo.

ScreenHunter 320.png
 
mrz020520dAPR20200205054521.jpg
 
Something I've heard from some people, even in the media, every since election night 2016, is that Trump didn't get as many votes as Romney. Of course on election night you don't know what the final vote tallies are going to be so you sort of have to wait until the counting is done. I used the numbers from wiki, which they have sourced, to compare the party vote for President from 2012 to 2016. A positive number means the 2016 candidate had more votes for that party than the candidate in 2012. A negative number would say the 2012 candidate had more votes. Trump states have his vote shaded red, Clinton states have her vote shaded blue. Maine gave an electoral vote to Trump (from CD-2) so I shaded Maine yellow. Trump had over 2 million more votes than Romney and Clinton had only around 62 thousand votes less than Obama 2012. It's where the vote differences by state occurred that really changed the outcome of the election in 2016 vs the outcome in 2012. The table is sorted by Trumps state performance compared to Romney. This table has nothing to do with the margin of victory between the two parties, only comparison of the performance of their 2016 candidate vs their 2012 candidate.

There was a lot of analysis after the 2016 election which claimed that Trump flipped a lot of votes in a number of states from blue to red. I think that's true. I think Trump's Texas performance, while he won, may have been adversely impacted by Cruz's refusal to endorse him at the Republican National Convention. As it stands now I think Trump will do a lot better in Texas and other typically red states this time around, including especially Utah. The democrats lost a lot of voters in 2016, for whatever reason, and they were unable to offset that in key states with their "changing demographics" strategy. The blue firewall in the Midwest collapsed in 2016 because voters either switched sides or stayed home. 2020 should be very interesting. jmo.

View attachment 261113
Interesting stuff.
 
Interesting stuff.

Another big factor in 2016 was the 3rd party (Others) vote. It increased in every single state as well as DC. Over 5.5 million more votes were cast for someone other than the 2 major party candidates in 2016 compared to 2012. It will be interesting to see who the 3rd party candidates are in 2020. I figure much of Gary Johnson's vote (4.9m) will return to the Republicans as well as Evan McMullin's (0.8m). Stein has less than 1.5m and there were a little less than 1.2m that voted for Freak.


ScreenHunter 321.png
 
So when the Republicans win back the US House of Representatives on November 3rd do y'all think Nancy Pelosi will stick around to be Democratic Leader? I think Nancy Pelosi will retire in January after the Republicans gain control of the US House of Representatives and Nancy's nephew California Governor Gavin Newsom will run for her vacated seat.
 
Yep. Trump is extremely popular with his base.

Nope. This doesn't affect the overall race.

Independent voters will likely decide the election.
I heard today there's 39% of Democrats that consider themselves moderate. No way they vote for Bernie. I don't think they will vote for Trump, they will just stay home.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst

VN Store



Back
Top