2020 Presidential Race

Come on man you and me both know if there was anything at all that they could have gotten him on he would have been crucified upside down. I'll spell it out for you. IT WAS ALL MADE UP.
  1. Fact Checks
  2. Politics
Did Mueller Conclude Trump Committed ‘No Obstruction’ in the 2016 Election Probe?


False

NADLER: Director Mueller, the president has repeatedly claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him, but that is not what your report said, is it?

MUELLER: Correct. That is not what the report said.


Did Mueller conclude that Trump obstructed justice? No.

Mueller detailed 11 issues related to the topic of obstruction of justice, but he did not make a traditional prosecutorial decision in regards to the matter. Instead, he collected evidence while “memories were fresh and documentary materials were available” and detailed those findings in this report.

While we can’t say if Trump obstructed justice (that determination is up to Congress, and, largely, the American public), we can say this: The special counsel’s report did not state that Trump committed “no obstruction.”
 
  1. Fact Checks
  2. Politics
Did Mueller Conclude Trump Committed ‘No Obstruction’ in the 2016 Election Probe?


False

NADLER: Director Mueller, the president has repeatedly claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him, but that is not what your report said, is it?

MUELLER: Correct. That is not what the report said.


Did Mueller conclude that Trump obstructed justice? No.

Mueller detailed 11 issues related to the topic of obstruction of justice, but he did not make a traditional prosecutorial decision in regards to the matter. Instead, he collected evidence while “memories were fresh and documentary materials were available” and detailed those findings in this report.

While we can’t say if Trump obstructed justice (that determination is up to Congress, and, largely, the American public), we can say this: The special counsel’s report did not state that Trump committed “no obstruction.”
He either did or didn't, there is no other option to be found by that investigation. They could not conclude that he committed obstruction.

But it has been determined that Clinton started this investigation for political purposes. If the federal government was weaponized for political purposes, and it appears it was, that should be much more concerning to America. If so the mask is off, the government cannot be trusted. Political operatives must be purged from the federal government or the people must revolt and remove that government. Those are the only two options, otherwise number of us can trust the government.
 
  1. Fact Checks
  2. Politics
Did Mueller Conclude Trump Committed ‘No Obstruction’ in the 2016 Election Probe?


False

NADLER: Director Mueller, the president has repeatedly claimed that your report found there was no obstruction and that it completely and totally exonerated him, but that is not what your report said, is it?

MUELLER: Correct. That is not what the report said.


Did Mueller conclude that Trump obstructed justice? No.

Mueller detailed 11 issues related to the topic of obstruction of justice, but he did not make a traditional prosecutorial decision in regards to the matter. Instead, he collected evidence while “memories were fresh and documentary materials were available” and detailed those findings in this report.

While we can’t say if Trump obstructed justice (that determination is up to Congress, and, largely, the American public), we can say this: The special counsel’s report did not state that Trump committed “no obstruction.”

The Muell didn't conclude anything. If you watched his testimony you'd know he didn't have a clue what was in the report.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top