Bassmaster_Vol
Volunteer Club Member June=#LifeMonth
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2016
- Messages
- 54,654
- Likes
- 230,885
Same here. Independent. Voted Libertarian the last 3 elections. I have never been prouder.A recount won't matter, whether it was by hook or by crook everyone just needs to go ahead and prepare themselves for the disaster and embarrassment of a Biden Harris administration. The realization that there are huge numbers of people stupid enough to vote for a useless scumbag like Joe Biden is just a sad fact of life that people need to come to grips with. I feel completely comfortable with my Independent status and my Independent vote.
We sat back and watched, shaking our heads as Hillary was shown to be above the law..above a subpoena from congress. We joked about "Clintoncide" knowing it was another example of Dems being above the law...
If you think that Republicans are gonna sit back and watch blatant fraud and the theft of the office of Potus ....and do nothing...you've got another thing coming. Trump needs to fight this garbage every single step of the way.
NOT 1 BALLOT BETTER BE DESTROYED. If it is thrown away, or otherwise cannot be produced to be verified...it doesn't count. Period. We want a mandatory recount of all swing States, as well as ANY other state where there is alleged fraud. Physically recount every single vote, and VET every single mail in ballot. EVERY SINGLE VOTE NEEDS TO BE RECOUNTED. NO MORE "VOTE DUMPS" THAT ARE 100% BIDEN AT 430AM.
While I agree with you (and that's what I posted prreviously), a state that saw close to 3.3 million people vote, had only 395k registered not make a vote. Thats seems weird to me.Trump received ~62.9 million votes in 2016, ~68.8 million and counting now, which works out to a 9.38% increase with more votes still to come in. Given that nationwide trend, no, a local 10% increase isn't that weird
Is it erroneous that she slept her way to the top, or is it erroneous to imply that anyone can sleep their way to the top in 2020?
Saying she didn't use a physical relationship for political gain is just ignoring reality.
The attack is uniquely made against women because it is a tactic that is uniquely avaliable to women. You don't have to like that fact, but that's the world we inhabit.
Making the claim that Kamala Harris exploited sexual favors for power is not an attack on women. "Women" did not exploit sex for power, Kamala Harris did.
There are GOP observers at every table. And it's livestreamed. This is stupid.
He got the most white vote ever. We flip so many seats in the House, hold the Senate, he got the most AA vote for a republican in 60 years. Ohio should show you what Michigan and Wisconsin would've been. And you don't think anything is strange?Trump received ~62.9 million votes in 2016, ~68.8 million and counting now, which works out to a 9.38% increase with more votes still to come in. Given that nationwide trend, no, a local 10% increase isn't that weird
I understand but my question was specific. At what times in our history since Roe/Wade has their been an R president and R majority in both houses. I don’t know the answer, do you know it?Anyway it is a weak or nonexistent argument to state the Republican Party is complicit in abortion infanticide.It's a part of my explanation. There are R presidents, R majority Houses, and R majority Senates since Roe and nobody has pushed for a case to challenge. The R party therefore isnt endorsing through action but inaction.
Agree about the slant of justices. It's why I was careful to label R/D appointed rather than R/D justice.