AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,596
- Likes
- 42,462
If the people who counted the first time are doing the recounts, don't expect anything different ... except a wider spread would help solidify the correctness of the first count. It's still not who votes, but who counts the votes that matters. Perhaps a recount and a look at the whats, hows, and whys by a real credible accounting firm should be the requirement rather than a bunch of amateur, political hacks dabbling in questionable math with potential garbage input.
I remember a time when you guys used to screech about the horrors of judicial activism.
Good luck.
I'd wager a paycheck that even the judges Trump appointed probably think he's a damn buffoon.
Courts forcing the states to follow the law as written is not judicial activism. That's what courts are supposed to do. The law is the law.
Activism is when it gets made up on the spot. Like with paper ballots.
I've got my popcorn. I'm glad things are getting shaken up.
So please explain the demographics that most supported trump, outside of the extremely wealthy and the uneducated white folks? Take a look at the county-by-county voting in most states and you will see the heaviest trump votes where? That's right...in the rural areas. What demographic typically exists in the most rural areas?? Please enlighten me.
If you don't like it being likened to judicial activism, to gloat about how it's not going to work out for the dems due to Trump giving the majority to conservatives.
Give me a break.
You actually think Trump wouldn't put his name on it?
Are you a felon? Then no. With your thinking we shouldn't have sex offender registries as well right? I mean, they served their time why should they continued to be punished for their crimes right?I mean, if you are a citizen that is not currently incarcerated you should be able to vote....right?