Orangeslice13
Shema Yisrael
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 95,089
- Likes
- 109,311
The Constitution says every citizen can own a gun, though.He did recant, and say someone paid him 130k. What's the correlation between guns and votes? Can I take my ballot down to the bank and rob them with my vote? If i leave my ballot laying around, can my 8 year old kill my 3 year old? Your argument is called false equivalency. Voting should be easy, it is a right bestowed every eligible citizen. Every citizen should not own a gun.
Not should but can. Every citizen ain't eligible because of criminal record or mental defect. I have no problems with guns, but what do guns have to do with voting? State your argument plain, because i will not go down a rabbit hole with you.The 2a says that every Eligible citizen who wants one should own a gun.
Everything you listed is already done. So what is the problem?
Not should but can. Every citizen ain't eligible because of criminal record or mental defect. I have no problems with guns, but what do guns have to do with voting? State your argument plain, because i will not go down a rabbit hole with you.
Except there is a correlation. There should be laws to protect society when it comes to voting. Voting should not be hard, but it should be protected. I've never understood the argument against voter ID. It's silly to think that requiring proof of who you are somehow makes voting harder. It doesn't.Again, laws have been put in place where criminals and others can not, for the safety of society. But what does that have to do with voting. Voting and guns are different things.
I had to verify my information when I requested a ballot. My wife did too.no it’s not.
It’s not even close.
In the places the system is stated was used there are no problems. However where they mailed out ballots to people who didn’t ask for them, didn’t require ID to vote day of. Didn’t require ID to request ballots, started counting before the mail in was complete acccetping ballots for days after the election, it’s been a complete cluster **** with at least 3 states being recounted.
Do you ever tire of being half informed and just plain wrong
I never cared who won and didn't support either candidate, yet I'm a firm believer in doing more to secure elections. So your "should of put forth a better candidate" deflection doesn't work on me. Again, voting should be simple, yet still secure. We need a better system. Period. It's not about who won THIS election, it's about making sure every election is fair and accurate. I don't think that's unreasonable.I had to verify my information when I requested a ballot. My wife did too.
Maybe you need to put forth a better candidate. Less racist would be a good start. A Mitt Romney type maybe.
Again, laws have been put in place where criminals and others can not, for the safety of society. But what does that have to do with voting. Voting and guns are different things.
wrong.Rallies don't win elections. Never been to a rally in my life.... no need to go. I knew who I was voting for. The rallies that donald has is more for his ego than anything else. They are like cult gatherings. He lies, they cheer. They chant, he smiles. Sad really....
He did recant, and say someone paid him 130k. What's the correlation between guns and votes? Can I take my ballot down to the bank and rob them with my vote? If i leave my ballot laying around, can my 8 year old kill my 3 year old? Your argument is called false equivalency. Voting should be easy, it is a right bestowed every eligible citizen. Every citizen should not own a gun.
Stop being dumb. I agree it is too much to overcome but when 150M people vote and it comes down to less than 45,000 total votes it is close.I'm getting tired of seeing the Trump apologists compare this to Al Gore in 2000. The 2000 election hung in the balance on one district in one state, which involved a margin of about 1,800 total votes on election night. That was a truly close election. This was not.
That may not be a bad idea.No citizen should have to pay a tax , or apply for and be granted or denied a permit to use a right they already have . Imagine the outcry of having to apply for a permit and be forced into taking an 8 hour course, while having a background check ran on you , just to vote .
I've said eligible. Should is nowhere in the 2A. It is implied can. Can meaning that can choose to do so or not. Just like everyone can vote. You have to show ID to to register, and you have to show ID when you vote. You just can't show up. How else will they know if you are registered. Otherwise you vote provisional ballot and have to return to verify your identity.As answered twice already. It goes to how important you view each issue. And you overlooked the word Eligible. And then started your straw man.
Which is typical of the disingenuous