2020 Presidential Race

[volinbham]

I feel like for the sake of continuity, especially with our election still “up in the air”, it would have been best to just ride it out.

I don't disagree - Trump does stupid shizz all the time. Was just saying that he was dead man walking well before the election

 

[OldVolMan]

Biden praised the BLM protests and actually made political ads catering to them.

He had to, BLM donates large amount of money to the Democratic party.

 

[volbeast33]

Nice. Getting his cult following to not only pay his legal fees, but also find the evidence of fraud for him.

Remember Jill Stein getting paid over a million dollars.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Biden's Pennsylvania lead is now big enough to avoid an automatic recount : politics

 

[titansvolsfaninga]

I'd like to start by seeing AZ, GA, NC, MI, PA, NV in the Presidential. Then every congressional election.

why?

 

[Orange_Crush]

I have an interest in the digital forensics of this supposed election fraud, so this caught my eye. I haven't verified this, but if the claims are true, it'll be explosive. I need to look at the data and his scripts to verify any further. I'm posting this as example of how the supposed fraud could and probably would be exposed.

Again, the forensic law is the same for digital forensics as it is for physical forensics "If you touch it, you will leave evidence behind".

https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8O2wesk/happening-calling-every-pede-to-/

He claims to have parsed the data feed from election database to the NYT and found every data glitch where votes were taken from Donal Trump and either given to Joe Biden, given to Jorgenson, or taken from Trump and just plain "lost".

This is only a few hours old.

(For the unitiated, .json data is a structured data type commonly used to feed from databases and, being structured, is very easy to parse and analyze via scripts and data analysis tools. If the official elections were updating media streams such as electoral maps and live broadcasts, this is how they would most likely have done it.)

So, it's true. I haven't done all the data, of course, to come up with total numbers, but I ran a spot check in PA. From the Edison Research data, between updates 187 and 188, with timestamps of just over a second apart:

Update 187

Trump had 1,689,208 votes
Biden had 1,253,476 votes

Update 188

Trump had 1,671,332 votes
Biden had 1,271,406 votes

That is a loss of 17,876 votes for Trump and a gain of 17,930 votes for Biden with an increase of only 756 total votes in the second between updates.

From a data analysis perspective, there really is no other way to interpret that than Biden being given (almost all of) Trump's votes.

I encourage everyone to parse the json and do the numbers for yourself. This is too big to take anyone's word for it.

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

ETA: This is just one example, and not the totality of PA data.

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

'Very, highly unlikely' Trump wins Arizona, no evidence of fraud, state Republican attorney general says : politics

This surely won’t help the narrative

 

[Orange_Crush]

Biden's Pennsylvania lead is now big enough to avoid an automatic recount : politics

If my suspicions from polling data analysis is correct, that will mean nothing. I suspect things are about to explode.

 

[Orange_Crush]

why?

I suspect massive digital fraud and would like to see the Presidential election settled as soon as possible.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I suspect this may be part of what Trump is holding in his vest pocket as the root of his confidence.

 

[NCFisher]

Boom!!! Looks like the GOP is gonna put a halt to all those freebies you Libs were expecting from Biden

Black Republications!?!? Whut thuh hail???

Don’t they know they gonna be strung up first chance, by the same people who voted em in?? It’s an elaborate trap you dumb Uncle Toms - ahhh HA HA HA!!

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

I suspect massive digital fraud and would like to see the Presidential election settled as soon as possible.

So we’ve now pivoted from massive mail in fraud to massive digital fraud. What’s next?

 

[SlingBlayde]

I suspect massive digital fraud and would like to see the Presidential election settled as soon as possible.

The Hammer and Scorecard

 

[Orange_Crush]

So we’ve now pivoted from massive mail in fraud to massive digital fraud. What’s next?

I posted the details of what I found and linked the data. If that's the level of response you want to offer, you do you.

And to answer your question, go back and read my posts. I've been talking about digital fraud and digital forensics for quite some time.

But again, gloss over the facts I just posted and do you. You'll never have the liberty to question me about being a reasonable poster again, though, if that's how you'll choose to have this conversation.

 

[evillawyer]

Always a tweet

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

I posted the details of what I found and linked the data. If that's the level of response you want to offer, you do you.

And to answer your question, go back and read my posts. I've been talking about digital fraud and digital forensics for quite some time.

But again, gloss over the facts I just posted and do you. You'll never have the liberty to question me about being a reasonable poster again, though, if that's how you'll choose to have this conversation.

I’d love to read it but the link is broken.

 

[SlingBlayde]

I posed a question to the anti-"voter fraud" crowd in another thread but haven't gotten a reply yet. I'll post it here... do you honestly think a party that spent millions of dollars over the past 3 years trying to get rid of Trump would leave this election up to chance?

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

I posed a question to the anti-"voter fraud" crown in another thread but haven't gotten a reply yet. I'll post it here... do you honestly think a party that spent millions of dollars over the past 3 years trying to get rid of Trump would leave this election up to chance?

I’ll answer your question with a question... why would the Democrats rig a Presidential election without also rigging the Senate and House elections? Why, if they were going for political control, would they trot out a 77 year old white man to be the face of it? If they’ve been planning a coup for 3 years as you claim, why wouldn’t they come up with a better option?

 

[Orange_Crush]

I’d love to read it but the link is broken.

Which link? The most recent one? It's to raw json data from Edison research for the PA election. If you have trouble reading the data, you can take my word for the math.

So, it's true. I haven't done all the data, of course, to come up with total numbers, but I ran a spot check in PA. From the Edison Research data, between updates 187 and 188, with timestamps of just over a second apart:

Update 187

Trump had 1,689,208 votes
Biden had 1,253,476 votes

Update 188

Trump had 1,671,332 votes
Biden had 1,271,406 votes

That is a loss of 17,876 votes for Trump and a gain of 17,930 votes for Biden with an increase of only 756 total votes in the second between updates.

From a data analysis perspective, there really is no other way to interpret that than Biden being given (almost all of) Trump's votes.

I encourage everyone to parse the json and do the numbers for yourself. This is too big to take anyone's word for it.

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

ETA: This is just one example, and not the totality of PA data.

This is one example of Joe Biden being digitally given over 17,000 of Donald Trump's votes in a matter of a second. I was turned onto this by many DFIR analysis who have already scripted and analyzed massive amounts of data and claim an ungodly number of examples across mutiple states, and across multiple races.

My math is just a spot check of their claims, which proves true. If this is indication that the rest of their data/claims is correct, it's explosive and proof of enough digital election fraud to steal more than the Presidential election.

But read that post and quip about it if you want.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I’ll answer your question with a question... why would the Democrats rig a Presidential election without also rigging the Senate and House elections? Why, if they were going for political control, would they trot out a 77 year old white man to be the face of it? If they’ve been planning a coup for 3 years as you claim, why wouldn’t they come up with a better option?

I posted the details of what I found and linked the data. If that's the level of response you want to offer, you do you.

And to answer your question, go back and read my posts. I've been talking about digital fraud and digital forensics for quite some time.

But again, gloss over the facts I just posted and do you. You'll never have the liberty to question me about being a reasonable poster again, though, if that's how you'll choose to have this conversation.


Which link? The most recent one? It's to raw json data from Edison research for the PA election. If you have trouble reading the data, you can take my word for the math.



This is one example of Joe Biden being digitally given over 17,000 of Donald Trump's votes in a matter of a second. I was turned onto this by many DFIR analysis who have already scripted and analyzed massive amounts of data and claim an ungodly number of examples across mutiple states, and across multiple races.

My math is just a spot check of their claims, which proves true. If this is indication that the rest of their data/claims is correct, it's explosive and proof of enough digital election fraud to steal more than the Presidential election.

But read that post and quip about it if you want.

(Sorry, at first glance, I thought this was to me. But the answer is appropriate to the question.)

Again... If the data proves out and the claims are correct, they did defraud congressional races.

And I also suspect mail-in fraud as well.

 

[SlingBlayde]

I’ll answer your question with a question... why would the Democrats rig a Presidential election without also rigging the Senate and House elections? Why, if they were going for political control, would they trot out a 77 year old white man to be the face of it? If they’ve been planning a coup for 3 years as you claim, why wouldn’t they come up with a better option?

Bad planning and execution LOL?

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Again... If the data proves out and the claims are correct, they did defraud congressional races.

And I also suspect mail-in fraud as well.

Forgive me, but I can’t decipher anything from this word salad.


I’ll gladly let you do the math on this. Lol

 

[lostsheep]

So, it's true. I haven't done all the data, of course, to come up with total numbers, but I ran a spot check in PA. From the Edison Research data, between updates 187 and 188, with timestamps of just over a second apart:

Update 187

Trump had 1,689,208 votes
Biden had 1,253,476 votes

Update 188

Trump had 1,671,332 votes
Biden had 1,271,406 votes

That is a loss of 17,876 votes for Trump and a gain of 17,930 votes for Biden with an increase of only 756 total votes in the second between updates.

From a data analysis perspective, there really is no other way to interpret that than Biden being given (almost all of) Trump's votes.

I encourage everyone to parse the json and do the numbers for yourself. This is too big to take anyone's word for it.

https://static01.nyt.com/elections-...0-11-03/race-page/pennsylvania/president.json

ETA: This is just one example, and not the totality of PA data.

Are you replying to your own post??

 

[GoBigOrangeUT]

Bad planning and execution LOL?

 

[Orange_Crush]

The data analysts that are driving this are claiming that the house/senate ratio is about to change radically once the fraud is exposed. They claim many of the seat the Dems won were stolen.

Again... This is all hypothetical at the moment for me. But I have proven one example directly from the data. It's hard to explain the data of just that one example.