2020 Presidential Race

I always say the same restriction, limitations, or qualifications should apply to all rights.

If you arent willing to accept that limit on one right you shouldnt accept it on any right.
You're technically right but in reality, wrong.

Welcome to the club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
For what exactly?
iu
 
"So somehow a Canadian company put Venezuelan voting machines in 33 states."

lol

Sidney Powell begins to release the Kraken…

Sidney Powell came out and said that the Dems planned the cheat, but vastly underestimated the number of votes that would come in for Trump, so they had to stop the counts to reset the machines and reset them to new algorithms.

Wow... She says that this is a foreign influence on national elections, and is a national security threat, so it's under the jurisdiction of military investigation.

She says that the voting data went to Barcelona Spain to data centers that are controlled by Venezuelan interests.

She says the election is invalidated by the voting software updates before the election because that is against federal law. She is also calling out the governor of GA by name, claiming he and his family received illegal bribes/kickbacks to install these machines in GA.

She said that the voting machines were connected to the internet to receive updates while the voting was stopped.

They are threatening class action lawsuits against anyone that certifies fraudulent election results.

She says this is going to the Supreme Court. Interviewer mentioned the perception that John Roberts has no appetite or will to see something like this that would overturn an election. She said if that proved to be the case it would be worthy of impeachment b/c the US election is nothing more than digitally-assisted multinational foreign election fraud on the US people.

Her claim is literally that the election software Chavez uses to guarantee his win in every election was weaponized against US elections.
If it wasn’t just so ridiculous I might believe it. Chavez? Really? What I find fascinating is that if all of this is proven false, this woman has ruined her career. And for what? To feed the ego of a narcissist?
 
If it wasn’t just so ridiculous I might believe it. Chavez? Really? What I find fascinating is that if all of this is proven false, this woman has ruined her career. And for what? To feed the ego of a narcissist?
She'll probably write a book, make millions off of speeches, just like her failed opponents on the left.
 
They still think the Clintons run a child sex ring in the pizza joint. They think Joe Biden has dementia. They think President Obama is a Muslim that was born in Kenya. They think donald is a successful business man. So I am going to go out on a limb and say no....
I don't think that Clinton runs the child sex ring. The rest of that.......................well.
 
Here's how it works in SF. You can get a CCP. But you have to have the Sheriff approve your application which is almost never done unless, maybe, if you are Dianne Feinstein, that is. So in reality, you, luther, can't get one and neither can McDad.
I have absolutely no problem with that and do not view it as any type of 2a violation or infringement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
All these dubious news sites and internet sleuths claiming mass voter fraud, but no evidence has been presented in court (19/20 cases dismissed and counting) and lawyers for trump campaign are literally quitting the case because there’s nothing to it. Also the only two documented, which both resulted in arrests, were in Pennsylvania for people voting for trump twice. I know republicans don’t care about facts but this is comical
 
But it is.

The fact that you are willfully ignorant in response to it is not surprising in the least.
But it's not. We seem to have found our point of disagreement - that's when the Supreme Court ultimately decides.
 
But it is.

The fact that you are willfully ignorant in response to it is not surprising in the least.
The thing that gun people tout about the second amendment is it’s supposed to provide a well armed militia to prevent a tyrannical government. But here we have someone trying to resist democratic election results and all the gun nuts are in favor it???
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
At this point, I can’t make that claim. Give it a couple of days. You don’t keep the lid on this story. So she may be an idiot by the end of the week.
Not to be needlessly pedantic, but that's exactly the claim you made.

You said that her claims are too far-fetched to be believed. So you seem to believe she's stupid enough to flush her career to feed the ego of a narcissist.
 
But it is.

The fact that you are willfully ignorant in response to it is not surprising in the least.
Let's see some Sheriff in GA be responsible for approving someone's voter ID, or press credentials and we will see a radically different response (even if they approve the applications).
 
But it's not. We seem to have found our point of disagreement - that's when the Supreme Court ultimately decides.
It will and the Sheriff will lose, when and if it gets that far. The way things are now, if an aggrieved party pushes it, it might not survive the 9th Circuit, with its new make up.

It shouldn't have to be that way.

Justice delayed is justice denied. How's that feel being used this way?
 
The thing that gun people tout about the second amendment is it’s supposed to provide a well armed militia to prevent a tyrannical government. But here we have someone trying to resist democratic election results and all the gun nuts are in favor it???
We're too late on the tyrannical government part. We allowed that to happen a long time ago.
 
The thing that gun people tout about the second amendment is it’s supposed to provide a well armed militia to prevent a tyrannical government. But here we have someone trying to resist democratic election results and all the gun nuts are in favor it???
Who is resisting results?

At worst, people are asking for claims to be vetted.
 
The thing that gun people tout about the second amendment is it’s supposed to provide a well armed militia to prevent a tyrannical government. But here we have someone trying to resist democratic election results and all the gun nuts are in favor it???
WTF are you talking about?

I should copy and paste this response and apply it to all of your posts as they spew forth from your keyboard.
 
Rudy Giuliani has filed to appear in Pennsylvania election case scheduled for today


Rudy Giuliani, President Trump's personal lawyer, formally told the court that he will represent the Trump campaign in its long shot case to block Pennsylvania from certifying votes.

The case and whether it should be dismissed will be argued in federal court on Tuesday.

The hearing will take place before Judge Matthew Brann in Williamsport in the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Brann is an Obama appointee, but is a longtime Republican.

On top of the fraud claims, his campaign and GOP allies have filed numerous and flimsy legal challenges in the days following the Nov. 3 election, with some attempting to deprive Biden of the Electoral College votes he's set to receive to become president.

On Friday, nine cases meant to attack Biden's win in key states were denied or dropped.

DbLUTZmU8AA1m5P.jpg

# # #


The SS Trump sails one last time...

giphy (46).gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
WTF are you talking about?

I should copy and paste this response and apply it to all of your posts as they spew forth from your keyboard.
The president is preventing Biden’s team from getting access to key updates and information since he won’t concede the race. What else would you call this if not resisting results? There is no path for a trump victory. What is he hoping to accomplish other than impeding the incoming presidency at the expense of American citizens?
 

VN Store



Back
Top