2020 Presidential Race

Yeah, how would the guy who controls the pieces of paper that the machine is designed to count, but isn’t a computer programmer, figure out if the machine counts the pieces of paper... 🤔

Why not just fire it up and run a control group of a few thousand ballots through to see if it spits out the right result?
Now you do bring up a good point here.
 
No idea. Regardless he said “audit” not “design review” like even you are fumbling over yourself on now.

A configuration audit is not a design review. I posted details of the differences a few pages back.

All an audit does is validate the configuration of the system. It does not validate the outputs vs inputs generally speaking.

But again I’m couching this all on inference from the SoS actual statement. I’m assuming he or his staff isn’t qualified to conduct detailed reviews of the design merely confirm his system configuration conforms to what the paperwork says it should be.

But that in no way addresses the claims Powell is making and is hopeless to even have a chance to do so.
We should assume that they are not qualified to conduct the review but we should assume that they would still use the same terminology (except it’s not even actually the same).

Nice try, but 👎
 
He actually looks more believable than Sidney Powell usually does. Powell does a lot of blinking when she is on these shows.

If she wears contacts, the lighting and cooling to counteract the heat from the lights may very well cause her to blink like that. It does look unusual.
 
Remember when VW diesels passed emissions tests with no problem ... and then somebody discovered that there was this little piece of code that turned emissions controls on and off depending on whether it was being tested or driven? Now if you ran a test like that and the machine couldn't tell real data from test data, and the system was locked down and couldn't be manipulated, then you might have something ... assuming there wasn't something in the machine that said "Aha, we're past 50,000 votes, it's not a test and adjusted the operating SW". There are too many ways to cheat with software; you have to know what it does line by line.

Reverse engineering malware has gotten progressively harder as malware tests its environments before running malicious code. So much so that there are specialty opensource projects designed to report how detectable sandboxes will be to malware.

Pafish is one example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
Literally not even a week ago, I heard ad nauseam about how fraudulent mail-in votes were. Even the President proclaimed as much. Now that those have been proving demonstrably false, the story switches to the computers. It’s all very convenient. What’s next? Mind-control drugs were administered during our COVID tests that made us vote for Biden?
 
We should assume that they are not qualified to conduct the review but we should assume that they would still use the same terminology (except it’s not even actually the same).

Nice try, but 👎
What? Regardless fail stop floundering. An audit isn’t a damn design review. Go comment on stuff you have some idea on.

In addition to actual design reviews another common part of the delivery is FAI or First Article Inspection. That is an audit in every sense of the word. It in no way is any kind of a test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
What? Regardless fail stop floundering. An audit isn’t a damn design review. Go comment on stuff you have some idea on.

In addition to actual design reviews another common part of the delivery is FAI or First Article Inspection. That is an audit in every sense of the word. It in no way is any kind of a test.

By what's been shared on that website, it is impossible to know if these assurances are meaningful or not. Nothing has changed. We'll have to wait and see how all of this shakes out.
 

VN Store



Back
Top