2020 Presidential Race

#91,351
#91,351
marcusluvsvols said:
Wow. Only 71% of the ballots cast in urban areas of Michigan ( cities, Biden dem votes) can be counted. As in recounted. Because the vast majorities of urban centers DID NOT balance...meaning the vote totals in their computers DID NOT match the actual number of ballots on hand. So they all went to " an alternate process" to certify their counts so they could report them.

Yall get this? Ya lying sacks?? Who are constantly crying about no evidence?

That means in all those big cities like Detrojt....the ONLY places Biden got more votes than Trump, often REPORTED to be by impossible margins like 95% Biden....in all those areas, they can only show a REAL ballot for 71% of the votes.

71%. Thats WITH all the fraud mail votes counted in....WITH any other fraud included... 71%.

What does that mean? That means that Trump won Michigan by HUNDREDS of thousands of votes. THAT is what that means.

Watch the video. First lady is all that is needed. Absolute BS.
Click to expand...



Everybody needs to watch this video!
 
#91,353
#91,353
NorthDallas40 said:
I’m not so sure. This is a peer challenge state to state based on a constitutional principles related to EC outcome impact. I’ve read opinions both ways.

But honestly I don’t think this will achieve the STATED outcome however over the last couple of days I don’t think that’s the DESIRED outcome. This late in the game on the day of safe harbor if we wind up challenging the votes in 5 states that could push us over the brink into open conflict in many areas.

No way Texas just came up with this so late. They’re playing a longer game. At this point I’m convinced the play is to put an asterisk by the Biden presidency, gain momentum for the midterms using an election steal narrative, and basically return a tit for tat on the last four years. And I’m fine with it. F$&@ their offer of unity 😈
Click to expand...


Come on now, you know everyone will unite under magic Joe.
 
#91,356
#91,356
EorXH1OXMAUpSqz


Part of Wisconsin's response to the Kraken lawsuit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and luthervol
#91,357
#91,357
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
Gee ...... you only have to explain this to the loonies here 20 times a day & they still don't get it.
Click to expand...
There is a sh!tload of concern over the equal protection clause. Voting rules cannot discriminate, and rules were basically changed that made voting by mail have less requirements than voting in person. That’s NOT equal. That is a direct violation and something the SC can definitely rule on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, loggervol and Y9 Vol
#91,358
#91,358
chargervol said:
If your candidate spent years attacking and insulting every voter that disagreed with him...but you believe it's *impossible* he lost.

If you've reached the conclusion Fox news is just way too liberal when they report a fact that you don't want to be true.

You need to seek out alternative "more truthful" news sources that only tell you what you want to hear.

If people doing their jobs are receiving constant death threats, even if they belong to your party or no party.

If freaking Q took a much larger presence in your party than comprehensible.

If you denounce the above but still buy into half the theories. Those that suggest your candidate won.

If you found demands for a birth certificate acceptable BUT the turning over of tax records "too far!"

If the head of your party is promoting civil unrest, so that he can undeniably scam donors out of their savings. And you're ok with that?

If your leader is calling other officials and begging them to undermine democracy in the US and you're ok with that, too.

If the White House has promoted taking better care of people in "red states"

The prez fires anyone that disagrees and replaces them with unqualified loyalists. ESPECIALLY in areas of national security or intelligence.

Several of your leaders have to hide just to acknowledge the president elect. While others still wet themselves in fear, at the scant thought.

If the leader reenacts Mussolini's balcony scene or uses the military against civilians to hold an upside down Bible. Both as photo ops, and you don't see an issue.

If, *regardless* of your belief in efficacy, you have ever seen a cloth mask as part of a conspiracy to enslave you.

If even a decent amount of your party has entertained picking up firearms and attempting a coup because of Twitter rumors or far right conspiracy theory hosts.
Click to expand...
Charger how is your family healing?
 
#91,368
#91,368
MontyPython said:
Questions for any and all that believe the election results (READ: Biden won) are somehow illegitimate:

(1) When else in the history of the United States was a Presidential election illegitimate?; and

(2) Given Trump similarly claimed in 2016 (prior to the vote) that the election results were "rigged", was the 2016 election similarly illegitimate?

# # #

October 17, 2016:

US election 2016: Trump says election 'rigged at polling places'

His comments appear to contradict his running mate Mike Pence, who told NBC Mr Trump would "absolutely" accept the election result, despite media "bias".

Mr Trump's adviser Rudy Giuliani has also accused Democrats of "cheating".

Polls suggest Mr Trump is losing ground in some key battleground states against Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.

Mr Trump has questioned the legitimacy of the election process in a series of tweets, the latest of which said on Monday: "Of course there is large scale voter fraud happening on and before election day.

"Why do Republican leaders deny what is going on? So naive!"

An earlier tweet said: "The election is absolutely being rigged by the dishonest and distorted media pushing Crooked Hillary - but also at many polling places - SAD."

The White House candidate also tweeted: "Election is being rigged by the media, in a coordinated effort with the Clinton campaign, by putting stories that never happened into news!"
Click to expand...
Hillary did try to rig the 2016 election. She was the one with Russia and tried to put it on Trump. And she cheated Bernie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, AM64 and Bassmaster_Vol
#91,372
#91,372
NorthDallas40 said:
Lol he said he would like to argue it if SCOTUS decides to hear it. They have to hear it first. And I believe Cruz was a fairly accomplished attorney having a Dep AG position for W and he was Solicitor General for the state of Texas. And it wasn’t that long ago
Click to expand...

Can't think of anyone I had rather argue it, or Mark Levin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol, GSD82 and W.TN.Orange Blood
#91,375
#91,375
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
We've already pegged you as Ronald McDonald Jr. little GA clown boi.....
Nobody can beat the title you hold over others. You're the biggest clown on VNPF.....wear it like a badge of honor.
Click to expand...
You seem a little irritable. I think people detoxing off of 4 years of Trumpism may get painfully ugly for some.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BenGrimm and MarcoVol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top