2020 Presidential Race

#92,001
#92,001
GSD82 said:
What does that have to do with anything? You don’t think this is a big deal? (Of course not because it’s a democrat) I know nothing will happen to him again because he’s a democrat but if this were a normal investigation the big guy who got 10% would also be investigated but he too is a democrat so nothing to see here
Click to expand...
Sorry. I'm not a Democrat. It certainly could be a big deal. He still won't be in the White House unlike the current clown-in-chief's children, who are at least as criminally corrupt as Hunter Biden
 
#92,003
#92,003
rocytop2624 said:
So we are Nazis and cult members. Anything else? I will state a fact DNC cheated Bernie and Biden took Bribes from China.
Click to expand...

We are racist, facist, nazis, dumb, clowns, cultists, POS......just wait till trump is signed back in. They will be looking in the dictionary for other mocking words
 
  • Like
Reactions: OL SMOKEY, AM64, GSD82 and 1 other person
#92,004
#92,004
USAFgolferVol said:
Sorry. I'm not a Democrat. It certainly could be a big deal. He still won't be in the White House unlike the current clown-in-chief's children, who are at least as criminally corrupt as Hunter Biden
Click to expand...
I honestly don’t care if Hunter Biden is a felon or crack head but it’s fun to make fun of.

This is a white collar finance crime investigation from reading three stories on it. I’ll bet we get to hear from Tony Bobulinski again before this is over. And if a money trail goes back to Sleepy Joe then he’s toast no if’s, ands or buts as this all happened while he was VP. But it has to be proven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, RavinDave and Gandalf
#92,005
#92,005
NorthDallas40 said:
You should forward that to the 18 Attorneys General.
Click to expand...

Each state can do something different than other states BUT they have to do those things consistently within their own borders (cant have different application of the law in one city vs another) AND any changes made to those rules have to be via the prescribed manner in legislation (or state charter).
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#92,006
#92,006
Gandalf said:
Each state can do something different than other states BUT they have to do those things consistently within their own borders (cant have different application of the law in one city vs another) AND any changes made to those rules have to be via the prescribed manner in legislation (or state charter).
Click to expand...
I believe that is the crux of the case yes. The constitution empowers only the state legislatures to mandate the states election laws.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and rocytop2624
#92,008
#92,008
rocytop2624 said:
First no slobbing here. But you should try and let Biden know. And Harris will definitely need to know. Also burning down city's and DNC cheating and defunding the police doesn't make you all patriotic since we are grouping people.
Click to expand...

Isn't it getting old being told what we should learn, how we should act, and the rest of their BS?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, W.TN.Orange Blood and rocytop2624
#92,009
#92,009
Gandalf said:
Each state can do something different than other states BUT they have to do those things consistently within their own borders (cant have different application of the law in one city vs another) AND any changes made to those rules have to be via the prescribed manner in legislation (or state charter).
Click to expand...
I'm all for nailing Biden if he's involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PointGuard
#92,012
#92,012
AM64 said:
I think these cases won't be heard because the can't be - can't be given any chance of succeeding. All levels and branches of government know what the outcome would be if this election had the slightest chance of being overturned. The politicians themselves know they were either complicit in setting up an election marred by fraud or were guilty of not doing enough (perhaps anything) to prevent it.
Click to expand...

I'm still sticking with Biden will not be President. There is now already too much that came out for the true conservatives to accept it, and I think there is much more to be coming out. The Texas lawsuit with other states joining is only going to unite conservatives, and will get SC's attention. I think it will be the difference maker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#92,013
#92,013
OldVolMan said:
We are racist, facist, nazis, dumb, clowns, cultists, POS......just wait till trump is signed back in. They will be looking in the dictionary for other mocking words
Click to expand...
Who's called you any of those things? I get why you like Trump. You play the victim as pathetically and cowardly as Trump himself
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#92,015
#92,015
OldVolMan said:
I'm still sticking with Biden will not be President. There is now already too much that came out for the true conservatives to accept it, and I think there is much more to be coming out. The Texas lawsuit with other states joining is only going to unite conservatives, and will get SC's attention. I think it will be the difference maker.
Click to expand...
I don’t know if he will or won’t. And if he is I don’t know how long he’ll be there. But it’s gonna be fun as hell watching the idiot Dems play defense 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and 1972 Grad
#92,017
#92,017
OldVolMan said:
I'm still sticking with Biden will not be President. There is now already too much that came out for the true conservatives to accept it, and I think there is much more to be coming out. The Texas lawsuit with other states joining is only going to unite conservatives, and will get SC's attention. I think it will be the difference maker.
Click to expand...
You think? LMFAO
 
#92,019
#92,019
OldVolMan said:
I'm still sticking with Biden will not be President. There is now already too much that came out for the true conservatives to accept it, and I think there is much more to be coming out. The Texas lawsuit with other states joining is only going to unite conservatives, and will get SC's attention. I think it will be the difference maker.
Click to expand...
Hate to break it to, but Trump isn't a true conservative
 
#92,020
#92,020
USAFgolferVol said:
I'm all for nailing Biden if he's involved.
Click to expand...

The beauty of this case is that it has little to do with Biden and nothing about fraud. It is also why so many states are signing on. SCOTUS cannot dodge this case (however they may wish to) and the facts of the case are almost guaranteed to deliver a verdict for the plaintiff. There is no question equal protection was violated as was the process of election rulemaking. The real question is what to do about it?

SCOTUS would not decide an actual election but the remedy requested is to let the 4 state legislative (elected) bodies choose new electors. This has some precedent and so it is possible that SCOTUS could provide that relief - but they might do something else instead. Even if you do have that, will the GOP legislatures get electors who vote for Trump? It will be popcorn time indeed.

Bottom line, however, is that SCOTUS can rule on a very narrow pathway, that accuses no one of fraud, decides no winner itself - and deliver a path for Trump to win 2020. Not "overturn" the election, mind you - in spite of MSNBC's breathless statements, no one has yet won the election...not till the electoral college meets and all the procedures are followed. That is why I think Roberts can safely vote on this because with the narrow ruling, essentially an important technicality, he is unlikely to be the 5th or dividing vote and it can be 6-3 giving him the cover he needs to still attend all those DC parties in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, TNVOLNAVY, NorthDallas40 and 1 other person
#92,021
#92,021
OldVolMan said:
Isn't it getting old being told what we should learn, how we should act, and the rest of their BS?
Click to expand...
It's the same ol same if they accuse you of something then they did it. And fox is the only one that will report none biased CNN and the others are in the lefts Pocket. Newsmax is right and OAN is right foxnew is trying to be fair and balanced except the opinionated host's.
 
Last edited:
#92,022
#92,022
NorthDallas40 said:
I honestly don’t care if Hunter Biden is a felon or crack head but it’s fun to make fun of.

This is a white collar finance crime investigation from reading three stories on it. I’ll bet we get to hear from Tony Bobulinski again before this is over. And if a money trail goes back to Sleepy Joe then he’s toast no if’s, ands or buts as this all happened while he was VP. But it has to be proven.
Click to expand...
I doubt it dems tend to be above the law
 
  • Like
Reactions: 508mikey and AM64
#92,023
#92,023
Gandalf said:
The beauty of this case is that it has little to do with Biden and nothing about fraud. It is also why so many states are signing on. SCOTUS cannot dodge this case (however they may wish to) and the facts of the case are almost guaranteed to deliver a verdict for the plaintiff. There is no question equal protection was violated as was the process of election rulemaking. The real question is what to do about it?

SCOTUS would not decide an actual election but the remedy requested is to let the 4 state legislative (elected) bodies choose new electors. This has some precedent and so it is possible that SCOTUS could provide that relief - but they might do something else instead. Even if you do have that, will the GOP legislatures get electors who vote for Trump? It will be popcorn time indeed.

Bottom line, however, is that SCOTUS can rule on a very narrow pathway, that accuses no one of fraud, decides no winner itself - and deliver a path for Trump to win 2020. Not "overturn" the election, mind you - in spite of MSNBC's breathless statements, no one has yet won the election...not till the electoral college meets and all the procedures are followed. That is why I think Roberts can safely vote on this because with the narrow ruling, essentially an important technicality, he is unlikely to be the 5th or dividing vote and it can be 6-3 giving him the cover he needs to still attend all those DC parties in the future.
Click to expand...
I never insinuated it had anything to do with the election. I was responding to the Hunter Biden investigation
 
#92,025
#92,025
Gandalf said:
The beauty of this case is that it has little to do with Biden and nothing about fraud. It is also why so many states are signing on. SCOTUS cannot dodge this case (however they may wish to) and the facts of the case are almost guaranteed to deliver a verdict for the plaintiff. There is no question equal protection was violated as was the process of election rulemaking. The real question is what to do about it?

SCOTUS would not decide an actual election but the remedy requested is to let the 4 state legislative (elected) bodies choose new electors. This has some precedent and so it is possible that SCOTUS could provide that relief - but they might do something else instead. Even if you do have that, will the GOP legislatures get electors who vote for Trump? It will be popcorn time indeed.

Bottom line, however, is that SCOTUS can rule on a very narrow pathway, that accuses no one of fraud, decides no winner itself - and deliver a path for Trump to win 2020. Not "overturn" the election, mind you - in spite of MSNBC's breathless statements, no one has yet won the election...not till the electoral college meets and all the procedures are followed. That is why I think Roberts can safely vote on this because with the narrow ruling, essentially an important technicality, he is unlikely to be the 5th or dividing vote and it can be 6-3 giving him the cover he needs to still attend all those DC parties in the future.
Click to expand...
Interesting summary. I’ll be shocked if SCOTUS rules in favor of this much less Trump actually prevailing in the election outcome. Don’t get me wrong I don’t want Biden it just seems awfully late for this play. But I am going to enjoy the ensuing theater 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top