TheMookieMonster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2015
- Messages
- 30,014
- Likes
- 118,096
Probably right. And I don't mean to knock Mashack at all. As I said, I know he is a very good player. I think the potential of Banchero and Chandler has just overshadowed this kid's recruitment a bit and it's affecting my POV.
I get that, but not as if you can’t have more than 2 guys. As I’ve stated before I would definitely look to sign at least 4 if I was Barnes, and wouldn’t totally be against 5 if it was the right combo.
These seem to be the main guys...
#2 Paolo Banchero - (6'9" PF)
#4 Jabari Smith - (6'10" PF)
#5 Brandon Huntley-Hatfield** (6'8" PF)
#9 Caleb Houstan (6’8” SF)
#10 Kennedy Chandler (6'1" PG)
#22 Charles Bediako (6'11" C)
#30 Daron Holmes ll (6’8” PF)
#48 Jahmai Mashack (6’4” SG)
#50 Micawber Etienne (6'10" C)
#86 Ryan Mutombo (6'11" C)
Yeah, they have invested some time in him and it appears to have paid off. He seems to be a lot like Keon Johnson. If his offense catches up as quickly as KJ's seems to have, he could be a steal. Much like Mashack, KJ didn't have a crazy stellar offer list, either.I don’t think he’s a back up plan, the staff has made him a priority.
I get that, but not as if you can’t have more than 2 guys. As I’ve stated before I would definitely look to sign at least 4 if I was Barnes, and wouldn’t totally be against 5 if it was the right combo.
These seem to be the main guys...
#2 Paolo Banchero - (6'9" PF)
#4 Jabari Smith - (6'10" PF)
#5 Brandon Huntley-Hatfield** (6'8" PF)
#9 Caleb Houstan (6’8” SF)
#10 Kennedy Chandler (6'1" PG)
#22 Charles Bediako (6'11" C)
#30 Daron Holmes ll (6’8” PF)
#48 Jahmai Mashack (6’4” SG)
#50 Micawber Etienne (6'10" C)
#86 Ryan Mutombo (6'11" C)
I think an argument could be made that Smith is more 50/50 as a one and done. He has Kevin Durant potential, but is still pretty raw as a player. The NBA drafts a lot on potential, but he may be a guy that decides that the difference in staying 1 year or 2 is the difference in being a late 1st rd pick and a lottery pick.Banchero and Smith are almost certainly one and done, Chandler would be 50/50 probably, I think Mashack is a multi year college player.
That possible, I would be curious how many Top 5 guys that are 6’10”+ weren’t projected lottery picks after freshman year...I doubt very many.I think an argument could be made that Smith is more 50/50 as a one and done. He has Kevin Durant potential, but is still pretty raw as a player. The NBA drafts a lot on potential, but he may be a guy that decides that the difference in staying 1 year or 2 is the difference in being a late 1st rd pick and a lottery pick.
And Smith might be the next in line. I just don't think he is currently skilled enough to automatically assume he'll be one and done. Watch his film and watch Banchero's and convince me there isn't a significant difference in skill levels.Last 5 classes...Labissiere(28), Simmons(1), Giles(20), Porter(14), Bagley(2), Ayton(1), Bamba(6), Bol(44), Wiseman(7*) and Carry(22*)...all went one and done, the * is projected in upcoming draft, obviously Bol Bol had the major injury concerns.
Absolutely there is, but there’s also a big different between a Top 3 draft pick and guys 12-15.And Smith might be the next in line. I just don't think he is currently skilled enough to automatically assume he'll be one and done. Watch his film and watch Banchero's and convince me there isn't a significant difference in skill levels.
Agreed. My contention, I guess, is that if he isn't projected to be in that top 15, does he come back to improve his stock into that lottery area. That is what I think a 2nd year in college could do for him. Because I don't think he's a slam dunk top 3-5 pick like Banchero, I dont think it is safe to assume he'll automatically be a one and done guy like I think its safe to assume PB will.Absolutely there is, but there’s also a big different between a Top 3 draft pick and guys 12-15.
If we land Banchero, Smith and Chandler I would put the percentages above 50% that at least 2 are gone after one year...that’s all my point was.Agreed. My contention, I guess, is that if he isn't projected to be in that top 15, does he come back to improve his stock into that lottery area. That is what I think a 2nd year in college could do for him. Because I don't think he's a slam dunk top 3-5 pick like Banchero, I dont think it is safe to assume he'll automatically be a one and done guy like I think its safe to assume PB will.
Long story short, I wouldn't lump the two of them together as sure-fire one and dones. PB, yes, definitely. Smith, I think there is at least a case for him staying 2 years.
Brady has really fallen off the radar. Once thought of as the top 2022 kid in the state of Tennessee, he just never really developed any further and was passed by others. Transferred to McEachern HS near Atlanta, and not even sure he's a kid who ends up playing P5 ball. Maybe a Mizzou, Ole Miss, Vandy type kid if he ends up in the SEC, but possibly even an MTSU type, as well. I'd bet most of his prior "offers" are no longer commitable.Where do we stand w SF/wings in this class? If Josiah and Keon both go pro, we’d have Ticket and probably Walker? If that’s a possibility I think that actually sounds pretty good. What’s the deal w Randy Brady? Are we actually pursuing him? Would he have the ability to contribute as a freshman?