BowlBrother85
1 star recruit
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 44,540
- Likes
- 39,118
You said that he quit when called to action.He quit during a war. Which part is dishonest? No need to spin or protect him.
Fact-checking attacks on Walz's military record by Vance and other Republicans
Republican vice presidential nominee and Ohio Sen. JD Vance sought to negatively frame the 24-year military career of Democratic vice presidential candidate Tim Walz, Minnesota’s current governor.
www.pbs.org
You are either lying, or you have a misunderstanding of the timeline. From the above article by PBS, which includes fact-checking reported by Fox News :
"Walz retired from the Minnesota National Guard in May 2005. He had submitted retirement paperwork five to seven months beforehand. Fox News reported, citing the Minnesota National Guard.
In March 2005, Walz's battalion had been notified about a possible deployment to Iraq within two years, Walz's camapaign said in a news release that month, citing the National Guard Public Affairs Office. The Minnesota National Guard said the battalion then received an official order about mobilizing for deployment to Iraq in July 2005, after Walz retired.
Vance's statement misleads by distorting the timeline. Walz had not been "asked by his country to go to Iraq," as Vance said. He had been given a two-year window for a potential deployment, not definite, deployment. And the official deployment notice came after Walz's retirement.
Walz has said since before his Army retirement that he left to run for Congress. He filed his candidacy paperwork in February 2005, before the March 2005 notification about the potential deployment."