Sudden Impact
Who we are is what We do with what We have!
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2007
- Messages
- 14,171
- Likes
- 7,519
no its not. Its made possible by your party, and your party alone. any decent Dem would be running away with this election. Forget battleground states where Harris has a 50/45 edge, it would be 75/25 for any decent Dem.Only made possible in a world where trumpism was the alternative.
Good response and thank you. To further discuss……how does having an open boarder allowing millions of un-documented people into the country and then paying for their healthcare, education and housing help our kids? They take jobs AND WE are left holding the financial burden. This is financially impossible.If I may, I think what you fail to grasp is understanding that many people...roughly half the voters...feel as strongly about Trump as you do about Kamala. Protecting their kids or grandkids from what they imagine Trump will do is just as important to them as you protecting yours from what you imagine Kamala will do.
SIAPName them. I've been around awhile. I can't think of anything that radical being enacted in my lifetime
Your questions are valid. And keep in mind, the questions others have about Trump are valid to them.Good response and thank you. To further discuss……how does having an open boarder allowing millions of un-documented people into the country and then paying for their healthcare, education and housing help our kids? They take jobs AND WE are left holding the financial burden. This is financially impossible.
Additionally, how does allowing the government to set pricing work? Ask Russia and Venezuela.
I really wish we could have a civil discussion like this rather than throwing arrows.
Walz has spent more time in China learning from them than all the other canadates combines. Harris and her left wing policies attack the Constitiution While Cobservations embrace it.You specifically mentioned all the lies in your post.
Your questions are valid. And keep in mind, the questions others have about Trump are valid to them.
I am neither pro/con Trump or Harris. I don't find either of them trustworthy to make our country better. And I gave up voting for the lesser of two evils approach many elections ago.
My perception is her team decided the risk of a debate on Fox isn't worth the reward. And, they are correct if they're thinking the folks watching a debate on Fox are likely not undecided voters.What is your perception?
Trump has walked into the lions den at the Democrat run Media for the debates. Why won't she extend the same courtesy? It absolutely shows weakness
Understood.And for me, that is why I am backing conservative policies. They , in my opinion, will serve my family better now, but more importantly, in the future.
We have seen four years of conservative policy and 4 years of liberals policies, to me, it is obvious.
I am not a Trumper. I have been a never Trumper from day 1. I didn't trust him day 1 in power. I have pointed out to people on the board here my issues with him, and had them talk it down as not being that bad that he broke the Constitution. I have a bet with a poster about Trump breaking the Constitution again with more anti-2A pushes.The point is that the people who care about the size of government are the ones who should care about it but they run around showing their ass saying “lol” when people talk about it in appropriate terms.
If you don’t care about a president “demanding that [his VP] overturn the results of the election,” then you don’t care about limited government. There’s no way around it.
Good politics I guess, but it exposes her weakness.My perception is her team decided the risk of a debate on Fox isn't worth the reward. And, they are correct if they're thinking the folks watching a debate on Fox are likely not undecided voters.
My personal decision if I were running for president would be debate anywhere, anytime, with any format.
Fellas, I think I'm at the point where I actually have a preference in this election. Can't remember the last time I had a preference. May have been Romney. May have been W.
But since Kamala may be worse than Trump, and absolute worst case scenario is Trump vs. Harris in 2028, I guess I'd prefer Trump winning now and getting it over with so the GOP can move on.
Don't do it , huff.Fellas, I think I'm at the point where I actually have a preference in this election. Can't remember the last time I had a preference. May have been Romney. May have been W.
But since Kamala may be worse than Trump, and absolute worst case scenario is Trump vs. Harris in 2028, I guess I'd prefer Trump winning now and getting it over with so the GOP can move on.
Fellas, I think I'm at the point where I actually have a preference in this election. Can't remember the last time I had a preference. May have been Romney. May have been W.
But since Kamala may be worse than Trump, and absolute worst case scenario is Trump vs. Harris in 2028, I guess I'd prefer Trump winning now and getting it over with so the GOP can move on.