2024 Presidential Race

#39,001
#39,001
LSU-SIU said:
People have asked you simple questions in this thread and the other thread multiple times to explain yourself. Instead of admitting to what you are truly hiding, you are wasting people's time by using mental gymnastics... this is not good faith.
Click to expand...
There’s nothing to admit. You made up an entire fantasy as to what “I’m hiding” because you should be on meds
LSU-SIU said:
The stuff on, 'this is not a court of law" makes sense in the context of the forum.... no I'm not going to write 5 pages of stuff to fully explain subjects which could be easily covered with 2 sentences for reasonable conversation on a forum.
Click to expand...
People asked you to produce one post, not write a dissertation. You couldn’t do it and you even started doing the “well, he wouldn’t say those actual words” because you couldn’t back up what you said.
LSU-SIU said:
I did not randomly call you pedo.
Click to expand...
You did and you keep doing it, again find me doing that to you unprovoked. Let me guess, “I can’t because it’s not a court of law” weak BS
LSU-SIU said:
As far as the rest, you continue to use mental gymnastics and not work in good faith even in this post.
Click to expand...
Calling other posters “pedo” and other people “IT” repeatedly and intentionally and then whining about how THEY’RE “not acting in good faith” is insane behavior
 
#39,002
#39,002
NashVol11 said:
There’s nothing to admit. You made up an entire fantasy as to what “I’m hiding” because you should be on meds

People asked you to produce one post, not write a dissertation. You couldn’t do it and you even started doing the “well, he wouldn’t say those actual words” because you couldn’t back up what you said.

You did and you keep doing it, again find me doing that to you unprovoked. Let me guess, “I can’t because it’s not a court of law” weak BS

Calling other posters “pedo” and other people “IT” repeatedly and intentionally and then whining about how THEY’RE “not acting in good faith” is insane behavior
Click to expand...

You are not working in good faith. People have asked you multiple times very simple things. They (included myself) have explained to you that the law can be tailored for example. You are not interested in honest and good faith discussion, a reasonable person can conclude the "why".

The solution seems simple - answer the people that inquire as to your true position in good faith. Heck, I just started off with what is Kamala's policy?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#39,003
#39,003
LSU-SIU said:
You are not working in good faith. People have asked you multiple times very simple things. They (included myself) have explained to you that the law can be tailored for example. You are not interested in honest and good faith discussion, a reasonable person can conclude the "why".
Click to expand...
I responded to “why not just ban it” in good faith already, you ignored the response and proceeded with more bad faith BS. “The law can be tailored” is in and of itself a meaningless statement, are you trying to say you can ban it and then make exceptions? That’s much more complicated and for no reason if the abortions that late are all for medical reasons already.

(And none of this involved me calling you a pedo or saying you’re banging men so STFU about “good faith”)
 
#39,005
#39,005
NashVol11 said:
I responded to “why not just ban it” in good faith already, you ignored the response and proceeded with more bad faith BS. “The law can be tailored” is in and of itself a meaningless statement, are you trying to say you can ban it and then make exceptions? That’s much more complicated and for no reason if the abortions that late are all for medical reasons already
Click to expand...

Actually, that is how the law works today. Statutory law is crafted by the imaginations of the legislative branch.

“The law can be tailored” is in and of itself a meaningless statement
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Huh. Driving a commercial vehicle is against the law, the exception is that if you are a certain age, go through certain steps, go to the DMV and pass a test, and get a commercial license... you can drive a commercial vehicle. Statutory law is already written in the most of the States I'm sure on abortions. Not sure what your point is.
 
#39,010
#39,010
LSU-SIU said:
Actually, that is how the law works today. Statutory law is crafted by the imaginations of the legislative branch.
Click to expand...
That doesn't address what I said, which is that that's needlessly complicated. A ban results in a ton more red tape and time spent going through the bureaucratic process of making sure each procedure is for an "approved" reason and verifying that to some government official's content. If people aren't getting elective abortions that late anyway, and as you said you've seen no evidence whatsoever that they are, then that red tape is all for nothing and only hurts those who actually need this.
LSU-SIU said:
Huh. Driving a commercial vehicle is against the law, the exception is that if you are a certain age, go through certain steps, go to the DMV and pass a test, and get a commercial license... you can drive a commercial vehicle. Statutory law is already written in the most of the States I'm sure on abortions. Not sure what your point is.
Click to expand...
Those are just exceptions, it's just a weird way to use "tailored" which has its own significance in a legal context. States having their own differing laws was the point, I thought, so we can see how different systems work
 
#39,012
#39,012
NashVol11 said:
Those are just exceptions, it's just a weird way to use "tailored" which has its own significance in a legal context. States having their own differing laws was the point, I thought, so we can see how different systems work
Click to expand...

Because that isn't how it written when it comes to statutory law. Again, we're on a forum, there isn't any significant about it.

States having their own differing laws was the point,
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

What is wrong with that? States are independent except for what was given to the federal government.
 
#39,013
#39,013
Vol8188 said:
Back that claim up (all abortions past x are medical).

I’ll wait
Click to expand...
I know you see the word "if" and I know you've seen me ask for the numbers that prove otherwise. Your best example wasn't even in the third trimester but that doesn't mean you get to shift the burden of proof to me now
 
#39,014
#39,014
LSU-SIU said:
Because that isn't how it written when it comes to statutory law. Again, we're on a forum, there isn't any significant about it.
Click to expand...
This is just word salad. How about this, explain "how you think it is written when it comes to statutory law" and also what "it" is
 
#39,015
#39,015
NashVol11 said:
I know you see the word "if" and I know you've seen me ask for the numbers that prove otherwise. Your best example wasn't even in the third trimester but that doesn't mean you get to shift the burden of proof to me now
Click to expand...

Okay…then answer the inverse.

What “if” your assumption is wrong? Then would you support bans on elective late term abortions. Because we both agree elective late term abortions occur.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#39,017
#39,017
NashVol11 said:
This is just word salad. How about this, explain "how you think it is written when it comes to statutory law" and also what "it" is
Click to expand...

I have no idea what you are talking about. States have had statutory law before your parent's parents were born, I have no idea what you are point is.... there is no word salad. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#39,018
#39,018
BowlBrother85 said:
His "style" is being pi$$ed that Harris didn't wan't anything to do with a former heroin addict, who once tried to board a plane bound for his rehab clinic .... while in possession of heroin.

You are assigning him a semblance of integrity that he has never earned.
Click to expand...

Not everyone can screwed their way to advancement or just pack up and leave when faced with adversity.
 
#39,019
#39,019
LSU-SIU said:
I have no idea what you are talking about. States have had statutory law before your parent's parents were born, I have no idea what you are point is.... there is no word salad. 😂
Click to expand...
No one is disagreeing that states have statutes, I'm asking what point you are trying to make by saying that
 
#39,020
#39,020
NashVol11 said:
No one is disagreeing that states have statutes, I'm asking what point you are trying to make by saying that
Click to expand...

You were concern I guess that banning something that it has necessarily be a complete ban, it doesn't have to be. For the most part, all these late term stuff imo gets into murder, generally speaking. They absolutely could make exceptions. Of course, at what point these are considered human is possibly a constitutional question.
 
#39,021
#39,021
BowlBrother85 said:
His "style" is being pi$$ed that Harris didn't wan't anything to do with a former heroin addict, who once tried to board a plane bound for his rehab clinic .... while in possession of heroin.

You are assigning him a semblance of integrity that he has never earned.
Click to expand...

I’m sure she spoke to Hunter more than once. But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe her official stance is “I oppose recovered addicts”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cod
#39,022
#39,022
BowlBrother85 said:
Whatever .....

www.mediaite.com

Project 2025 Co-Author Caught On Undercover Video Saying Trump ‘Supportive’ of Plan Trump Now Disavows

While former President Donald Trump has repeatedly, publicly distanced himself from Project 2025 -- a 900-page guidebook for Trump's second term as President -- one of the document's co-authors was caught on a hidden camera stating that the ex-president "blessed" everything in it. Russell Vought...
www.mediaite.com www.mediaite.com
Click to expand...
Lol.

blessing-mayabazar.gif
 
#39,023
#39,023
LSU-SIU said:
You were concern I guess that banning something that it has necessarily be a complete ban, it doesn't have to be. For the most part, all these late term stuff imo gets into murder, generally speaking. They absolutely could make exceptions. Of course, at what point these are considered human is possibly a constitutional question.
Click to expand...
I didn't say complete ban, I said that even for a ban with exceptions, there's a lot of time and bureaucracy in determining whether those exceptions were appropriately met (with documentation, official government approval, etc.) and that red tape could be harmful to people with medical issues
 
#39,025
#39,025
NashVol11 said:
I didn't say complete ban, I said that even for a ban with exceptions, there's a lot of time and bureaucracy in determining whether those exceptions were appropriately met (with documentation, official government approval, etc.) and that red tape could be harmful to people with medical issues
Click to expand...

Than you go to State legislative branch. All kinds of things could harmful to people, so? I mean like give wearing diapers on their face, to clot shots, etc.

I hope there is ton of red tape for people to justify a murder especially all this late term crap.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top