2024 Presidential Race


It's not human nature to lie about donating money to charities.


Basically, Trump pledged to donate $10,000 to 9/11 charities, but never did .... but he later took credit for it as if he really had. To top it all off, Trump did accept $150,000 from a 9/11 organization which helped reimburse businesses for extra expenses incurred or revenue lost in the aftermath of the attacks. Trump had allowed clean-up and recovery crews to use Trump Tower without paying any rent. So, Trump couldn't keep his relatively small pledge, for a billionaire, but he did accept money from a 9/11 organization as if he was a charity case himself.

^^^^ That is who Donald Trump is. ^^^^

He is not a decent person.
Have you asked him why?

He did give up his Presidential salary iirc. If that the worst he did than he's doing pretty good in modern history as a Presidential candidate.

So, if he would have donated $10,000 and murdered some Americans and sent even more Americans into a foreign land that would have been great.

I'm so confused.
 

It's not human nature to lie about donating money to charities.


Basically, Trump pledged to donate $10,000 to 9/11 charities, but never did .... but he later took credit for it as if he really had. To top it all off, Trump did accept $150,000 from a 9/11 organization which helped reimburse businesses for extra expenses incurred or revenue lost in the aftermath of the attacks. Trump had allowed clean-up and recovery crews to use Trump Tower without paying any rent. So, Trump couldn't keep his relatively small pledge, for a billionaire, but he did accept money from a 9/11 organization as if he was a charity case himself.

^^^^ That is who Donald Trump is. ^^^^

He is not a decent person.

It's not human nature to lie about donating money to charities.


Basically, Trump pledged to donate $10,000 to 9/11 charities, but never did .... but he later took credit for it as if he really had. To top it all off, Trump did accept $150,000 from a 9/11 organization which helped reimburse businesses for extra expenses incurred or revenue lost in the aftermath of the attacks. Trump had allowed clean-up and recovery crews to use Trump Tower without paying any rent. So, Trump couldn't keep his relatively small pledge, for a billionaire, but he did accept money from a 9/11 organization as if he was a charity case himself.

^^^^ That is who Donald Trump is. ^^^^

He is not a decent person.
You just can't answer questions directly...you may not think he is and that fine...there are many billionaires out there that do worse..does that make Trump's actions acceptable no...but he has paid his price for his mistakes...what's the SOL on bad behavior??? Seems for Trump there is no timeframe even tho others have does worse and been forgiven by Dems..your anti trump cultisy is showing...good luck anf go vols...it game time
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
He did give up his Presidential salary iirc.
A hollow gesture that was.


So, if he would have donated $10,000 and murdered some Americans and sent even more Americans into a foreign land that would have been great.

I'm so confused.
Yes, you are.
 
Anyone whose position is that Romney, McCain, Christie, etc.....were viewed the same as trump by those on the left is beyond clueless.

Trump was hated much more and by a much higher percentage. Honestly, any claim otherwise is stupid.

Just look at the 16 people in the 2016 republican primary - they were not viewed equally - trump was unique in how he was viewed.
Strawman.

No one is saying those men were hated like Trump. That’s just you trying to reframe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Anyone whose position is that Romney, McCain, Christie, etc.....were viewed the same as trump by those on the left is beyond clueless.

Trump was hated much more and by a much higher percentage. Honestly, any claim otherwise is stupid.

Just look at the 16 people in the 2016 republican primary - they were not viewed equally - trump was unique in how he was viewed.

Because the bots like yourself are programmed to do what the mothership wants. In this case, its one coin with two sides..... controlled opposition see The Matrix.... the appearance of free choice.

As mentioned, the only way to make this more obvious is Romney, Bush, Cheney, Paul Ryan, etc. to fully endorse the hooker.

trump was unique in how he was viewed.

He was not part of system which you have been voting for which is why the U.S. is in horrible shape, Trump didn't cause that. You caused it, now you are saying we need more of what you caused.
 
They don’t “make it clear” but another hole in your theory. Kelly is an honorable career military officer, I think if he heard Trump say those things he would have resigned immediately. I know if my boss said something as disrespectful as that to me I would have quit that day and I’m nowhere near as honorable as Kelly.
I've always thought that myself. I don't see anyone of that rank not resigning on the spot if they heard crap like that come out of Trumps mouth. And if he did hear that, and did not resign, then he's a pos too. It would be a terrible look for Kelly if true
 
The part that shows he's most out of touch is where he talks about single women having $5000/month 1200 square foot apartments in NYC. First, that's huge for a single person in NYC. A big apartment for a single person is 900 SQ. Ft. Most are more like 500-600 SQ ft. Second, $5000 a month for 1200 SQ ft would be an absolute bargain.

 
I don't.

I'm just having fun watching the maga bozos desperately try to deflect from reality.

Imagine being such a douchebag that the US Army and AN Cemetery officials call you out publicly for your lack of decorum.

The sad thing is, no one is even surprised. It's just another circle the wagons and redirect the conversation day for MAGA.
The MAGA nuts are the ones that brought up Arlington to do the "wHy WaSnT kAmAlA tHeRe" thing, and then it backfired
 
The part that shows he's most out of touch is where he talks about single women having $5000/month 1200 square foot apartments in NYC. First, that's huge for a single person in NYC. A big apartment for a single person is 900 SQ. Ft. Most are more like 500-600 SQ ft. Second, $5000 a month for 1200 SQ ft would be an absolute bargain.


 
The MAGA nuts are the ones that brought up Arlington to do the "wHy WaSnT kAmAlA tHeRe" thing, and then it backfired

Or more like she is on team One that wanted them all dead to start with.

Kamala nor Obama, Biden, Bush, Clinton, Cheney, McCain, etc could give two ***** whether any of these people died. For the most part, it was part of the plan.

Soldiers didn't go to Vietnam to win, they went to Vietnam so someone could get money eventually back here. The dying part is just a price of doing business. (rinse and repeat)

Very similar to caring about the hairy thing or women.... you don't care.

Everyone cares about about the poor soldiers but somehow they always go back and vote for the same stupid ass nonsense. The Truth is you really don't care, you never did, and you probably never will.
 
Last edited:
Strawman.

No one is saying those men were hated like Trump. That’s just you trying to reframe.
That is absolutely what you were insinuating.

My position is that every candidate in history has had distractors from the opposing side that portray them in the most negative way possible.

Pointing out that it was done against Romney is pointless.....it's a given. It adds absolutely nothing to the conversation.

It's all about the number of people within each level of dislike. trump has been unmatched - rightfully so - and any attempt to normalize that or create even more false equivalences is weak.
 
That is absolutely what you were insinuating.

My position is that every candidate in history has had distractors from the opposing side that portray them in the most negative way possible.

Pointing out that it was done against Romney is pointless.....it's a given. It adds absolutely nothing to the conversation.

It's all about the number of people within each level of dislike. trump has been unmatched - rightfully so - and any attempt to normalize that or create even more false equivalences is weak.

They programmed you to believe that, and the reason you gave after hours of me asking was because he said, "lock her up". My problem with Trump is he should have locked her up.

You're not making any sense. There was no reason to vote for Romney as Romney is just the other side of the coin opposite of Obama. Why would anyone vote for Romney or Obama?

The lie you are promoting became obvious even for the least aware person, which is why there is Trump. The U.S. sucks because of you, and Trump realistically only exists because of you. Your problem is not Trump, its you.

This country has been on a steady rate of decline for 30-35 years, no? Is that Trump's fault too? You are the problem, you have voted for this the whole freaking time. You have mostly gotten what you asked for, yet here we are.

Who's the blame for the state of the country?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: dovervolz
I think this is an absolute nothing burger that no one on either side cares about. Yet many on your side act as if they care because they think it scores them points
Agreed, it is simply a deflection. This and other deflections that will come are designed to keep the spotlight off a candidate who is hiding her true policies from the voting public.
 
They programmed you to believe that, and the reason you gave after hours of me asking was because he said, "lock her up". My problem with Trump is he should have locked her up.

You're not making any sense. There was no reason to vote for Romney as Romney is just the other side of the coin opposite of Obama. Why would anyone vote for Romney or Obama?

The lie you are promoting became obvious even for the least aware person, which is why there is Trump. The U.S. sucks because of you, and Trump realistically only exists because of you. Your problem is not Trump, its you.

This country has been on a steady rate of decline for 30-35 years, no? Is that Trump's fault too? You are the problem, you have voted for this the whole freaking time. You have mostly gotten what you asked for, yet here we are.

Who's the blame for the state of the country?
How do you measure the success of a country? Because with just about any index, the period between 1992-1999 was a time of tremendous economic growth, and prosperity. Relatively speaking, it was also a time of peace.

Also .... even politically, and in the midst of a partisan impeachment proceeding, and a sordid presidential affair exposed in 1998 .... we also had productive bi-partisan collaboration between the Clinton Administration and House Republicans led by Newt Gingrich. They really did get a lot of legislation through, with both sides getting some of what they wanted, and neither insisting on getting all of the credit.

Basically, you are going back at least 5 years too far with that "This country has been on a steady rate of decline for 30-35 years," nonsense.

If you couldn't make ends meet in the late 90's .... that was pretty much your own damn fault.
 
I don't have theory. This isn't as open to interpretation as you want to think.

Like I said .... you can call Kelly a liar. That's what you're doing. It is silly to take Trump's word over his ... but whatever.

I’ve not called Kelly a liar. I’ve only called the people falsely putting words into his mouth a liar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT

VN Store



Back
Top