2024 Presidential Race

#63,526
#63,526
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, widely viewed but that wasn't the reality, and pandering didn't change how they were viewed. We also saw a record number of apprehensions at the border. Look at this **** in the infographic. Can you honestly expect them to do more? And you're talking about stuff from 5+ years ago, and OP is talking about her campaign pandering to the far left, which it did not at all.

View attachment 695512
Click to expand...

I don't know what you are going on about, but that lady can barely speak... let alone express anything you are writing about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zues1
#63,527
#63,527
Weezer said:
What is wrong with this country that this show is still on the air?
Click to expand...

This is 1 example of many on why you vote for Trump. These people are crazy and deranged. They tried as hard as they could to ruin Trump for many reasons. Yes, Trump wouldn't stop talking but that is no reason to go after him with lawfare.

These folks are in pain and you know what it's kinda funny to listen to. This is their coping mechanisms and one of many of their stages of grief. They have learned nothing. Blame things on others.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zues1 and InVOLuntary
#63,529
#63,529
lostsheep said:
Absolutely love to see the back-patting and chest-bumping going on in here amongst the trumpers. It is almost as if you guys have convinced yourself that because he won the election that the man isn't still a fraud. I'd like to see some of the mental gymnastics you guys will go through the explain the following:

2020: Trump alleges cheating is going on before the election
2020: Trump gets thumped by Biden in said election
2020: Trump never concedes the election
2024: Trump alleges cheating is going on before the election
2024: Harris gets thumped by Trump in said election
2024: Harris concedes the day after the election
2024: Harris's camp never alleges any cheating or wrongdoing in the election

Did the democrats just forget how to cheat?? Or is it possible that cheating is going on anytime they lose, but never happens when they win?
Click to expand...
No, they did not forget how to cheat. Trump and team figured out how to be proactive in stopping it.

www.democracydocket.com

2024 Is Already The Most Litigated Election On Record

Read more here.
www.democracydocket.com www.democracydocket.com

Lara Trump and Co had attorney’s everywhere….and they were ready.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL, Zues1, InVOLuntary and 5 others
#63,530
#63,530
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, widely viewed but that wasn't the reality, and pandering didn't change how they were viewed. We also saw a record number of apprehensions at the border. Look at this **** in the infographic. Can you honestly expect them to do more? And you're talking about stuff from 5+ years ago, and OP is talking about her campaign pandering to the far left, which it did not at all.

View attachment 695512
Click to expand...
How absolutely stupid do you have to be to miss the point that an "apprehension" is useless when you let them into the country once you "apprehend" them?

Government stats, super trustworthy! 🥴
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, MR_VOL, AM64 and 10 others
#63,531
#63,531
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, widely viewed but that wasn't the reality, and pandering didn't change how they were viewed. We also saw a record number of apprehensions at the border. Look at this **** in the infographic. Can you honestly expect them to do more? And you're talking about stuff from 5+ years ago, and OP is talking about her campaign pandering to the far left, which it did not at all.

View attachment 695512
Click to expand...

What did they do with them after they apprehended them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, AM64, DynaLo and 4 others
#63,536
#63,536
n_huffhines said:
Yeah, widely viewed but that wasn't the reality, and pandering didn't change how they were viewed. We also saw a record number of apprehensions at the border. Look at this **** in the infographic. Can you honestly expect them to do more? And you're talking about stuff from 5+ years ago, and OP is talking about her campaign pandering to the far left, which it did not at all.

View attachment 695512
Click to expand...
Yeah, record numbers of apprehensions, and then where did many go after that?

And also, given that she was thrust into Presidential candidacy under weird circumstances under a compressed timeline, the pandering she did when she ran for President previously became really relevant. I mean, is it unreasonable to be skeptical of her sudden support for fracking after having been consistently against it for years? She didn't campaign necessarily on trans issues, but had advocated policies on the record that, to put it mildly, are outside the mainstream.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT and W.TN.Orange Blood
#63,538
#63,538
BowlBrother85 said:
Even if true ....

How does that make him narcissistic? Once again, you are applying narcissism as a blanket term for things you don't like .... That's not narcissistic, by itself. Read the 12 personality traits most associated with narcissism from post # 37,178.
Click to expand...
Bob exhibiting a good portion of your 12 personality traits of a narcissist by not conceding.
 
#63,542
#63,542
05_never_again said:
Yeah, record numbers of apprehensions, and then where did many go after that?

And also, given that she was thrust into Presidential candidacy under weird circumstances under a compressed timeline, the pandering she did when she ran for President previously became really relevant. I mean, is it unreasonable to be skeptical of her sudden support for fracking after having been consistently against it for years? She didn't campaign necessarily on trans issues, but had advocated policies on the record that, to put it mildly, are outside the mainstream.
Click to expand...
Looking at it from my perspective (not the people who would actually ever vote for her if she were the ideal leftist candidate), I would bet all her "ban fracking" stuff was just lip service. The odds of her pulling that off, even if she really wanted to, are extremely low.

I think that's the key point...how you and I view her pandering is not how people who would vote for view it. We had 12m fewer voters this election? There's the dub right there
 
#63,546
#63,546
Matt2496 said:
They sure are quick to turn on a woman of color who lost an election.

It's pretty telling.
Click to expand...
This is what happens when you stay around too long and no plan. The left will have a cleansing to the party and the faces..the damage is done to the party. So, they are correct in the slogan “we’re not going back”.
 
#63,548
#63,548
n_huffhines said:
Looking at it from my perspective (not the people who would actually ever vote for her if she were the ideal leftist candidate), I would bet all her "ban fracking" stuff was just lip service. The odds of her pulling that off, even if she really wanted to, are extremely low.

I think that's the key point...how you and I view her pandering is not how people who would vote for view it. We had 12m fewer voters this election? There's the dub right there
Click to expand...
Of course it was lip service. But if you're in Pennsylvania or some area where fracking is important, it is unreasonable to be turned off by that, even if you believe she could never get it passed? You're going to probably look elsewhere as far as a candidate.

Paying taxes on unrealized gains was another asinine idea that would also be impossible to pull off, but I mean, she still advocated for it and I held it against her.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top