2024 Presidential Race

#64,701
#64,701
VOLS INC. said:
Not to mention how they screwed over their voters by pretending Biden was fine (until they couldn’t any longer) and then in an attempt to prove how much they cared about democracy, the most wealthy and powerful people in the party installed his replacement with zero discussion, vote, etc.
Click to expand...
I was actually impressed that Biden had just enough in him to actually do the right thing and torpedo the Harris campaign right at the end. Assuming it was on purpose of course. I'll bet Barry Soetoro is still fuming that he wouldn't get a fourth term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL, UT_Dutchman, InVOLuntary and 1 other person
#64,702
#64,702
BowlBrother85 said:
You never got back to me on your opinion of National Review, but anyone with any knowledge of them at all knows that is an American politically conservative magazine.



Please show your ignorance and call National Review "liberal" or "leftist."
Click to expand...
Congratulations on findíng another right wing service to read..maybe it'll open your eyes some..but I doubt it...so now it 2 sources out of 18...still 89% left wing..keep going..and I love the insults, that your go to when you know your being called out...and your struggling to accept it ..good luck with your growth
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#64,703
#64,703
BowlBrother85 said:
The primary sources of information that I link :

Business Insider
Time
Newsweek
Forbes
Fortune
ABC News
NBC News
CBS News
USA Today
The Wall Street Journal
The Washington Post
The New York Times
Axios
The Economist
Brookings
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Politico
The Hill

I would put those sources up against any that are linked here from the right-wing echo chamber (which you still haven't demonstrated a command of).
Click to expand...
🤣 🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤣🤣😂😂🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#64,708
#64,708
BowlBrother85 said:
You never got back to me on your opinion of National Review, but anyone with any knowledge of them at all knows that is an American politically conservative magazine.



Please show your ignorance and call National Review "liberal" or "leftist."
Click to expand...
Dude. You are trying to show balance by citing one publication out of the 20 other leftist rags you cited? It's like some dudes saying they are cool because they have a black/white/indian/asian friend. You're drowning son.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL, InVOLuntary, whodeycin85 and 1 other person
#64,709
#64,709
FLVOL69 said:
No we want accountability Cletus, your side tried to put Trump in prison,bankrupt the man and tried to assassinate him.All the bs lies and treasonous behavior is going to be exposed.
Click to expand...
I just hope the Epstein list gets released. I can guarantee that it is the nuclear option the democrats would be using this very moment if Trump were on it. They aren't, so he isn't. I'll bet they are terrified.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MR_VOL, InVOLuntary and FLVOL69
#64,710
#64,710
VOLS INC. said:
That’s fair.

And what he shot them with. I mean are we talking a paintball gun? A water gun? Or are we talking a military style semi-auto that can fire 1200 rounds a minute?
Click to expand...

Fastest-firing machine pistol: Glock 18 (1,200 rounds per minute)​

 
#64,712
#64,712
SpaceCoastVol said:
Dude. You are trying to show balance by citing one publication out of the 20 other leftist rags you cited? It's like some dudes saying they are cool because they have a black/white/indian/asian friend. You're drowning son.
Click to expand...
Do I need to post more? Because I certainly can.

The eagerness of this forum to believe anything posted to social media from a far-right zealot vs what is dismissed as liberal bias makes for a wild juxtaposition of double standards.

In other words, a tweet from Laura Loomer passes muster, but The Wall Street Journal is not a reliable source because they're biased. This is not the real world. It's craziness. This forum is an echo chamber. You don't realize how extreme some of your opinions are, especially when it comes to sources of information.
 
#64,714
#64,714
BowlBrother85 said:
Do I need to post more? Because I certainly can.

The eagerness of this forum to believe anything posted to social media from a far-right zealot vs what is dismissed as liberal bias .... makes for a wild juxtaposition of double standards.

In other words, a tweet from Laura Loomer passes muster, but The Wall Street Journal is not a reliable source because they're biased. This is not the real world. It's craziness. This forum is an echo chamber. You don't realize how extreme some of your opinions are, especially when it comes to sources of information.
Click to expand...
The WSJ has it's moments. They do lean left in a lot of areas though. I'll allow 1/2 credit on that one. Other than that your list is a reading list for TYT or the hens on The View. I was actually shocked years ago that the NYT could politicize the business section. No wonder the airline gave that fish wrapper away. No one in their right mind would pay for it.

And your post is telling too where you refer to right wing "zealot" and left leaning "bias". Quite an extreme differentiation wouldn't you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#64,716
#64,716
volinbham said:
do you believe it is scientifically possible for that gun to fire an actual1200 rounds in one minute? or anything close to that?
Click to expand...
www.libertysafe.com

What are the Fastest Firing Guns?

Ever since the invention of the first man-portable firearms, people have been interested in shooting them faster. A good revolutionary war era soldier could get off three shots a minute from his smoothbore musket, and breech-loading designs sped that rate of fire up considerably. Table of...
www.libertysafe.com www.libertysafe.com

Don't know and don't really care.
 
#64,719
#64,719
luthervol said:
www.libertysafe.com

What are the Fastest Firing Guns?

Ever since the invention of the first man-portable firearms, people have been interested in shooting them faster. A good revolutionary war era soldier could get off three shots a minute from his smoothbore musket, and breech-loading designs sped that rate of fire up considerably. Table of...
www.libertysafe.com www.libertysafe.com

Don't know and don't really care.
Click to expand...
Liar. It goes right to the heart of the nonsensical diatribe you went on regarding your gun grabbing tendencies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and InVOLuntary
#64,720
#64,720
luthervol said:
www.libertysafe.com

What are the Fastest Firing Guns?

Ever since the invention of the first man-portable firearms, people have been interested in shooting them faster. A good revolutionary war era soldier could get off three shots a minute from his smoothbore musket, and breech-loading designs sped that rate of fire up considerably. Table of...
www.libertysafe.com www.libertysafe.com

Don't know and don't really care.
Click to expand...

it's a theoretical limit on a firing mechanism but physics and human interaction render it completely meaningless.

thought we were supposed to trust the science?
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and InVOLuntary
#64,721
#64,721
SpaceCoastVol said:
The WSJ has it's moments. They do lean left in a lot of areas though. I'll allow 1/2 credit on that one. Other than that your list is a reading list for TYT or the hens on The View. I was actually shocked years ago that the NYT could politicize the business section. No wonder the airline gave that fish wrapper away. No one in their right mind would pay for it.

And your post is telling too where you refer to right wing "zealot" and left leaning "bias". Quite an extreme differentiation wouldn't you think?
Click to expand...
There is indeed an extreme differentiation from Laura Loomer and The Wall Street Journal. However, I have seen her social media posts treated as gospel on here. She has promoted 9/11 truther theories, Q Anon, PizzaGate, Sandy Hook Elementary hoax theories and Obama birtherism.
 
#64,722
#64,722
BowlBrother85 said:
Do I need to post more? Because I certainly can.

The eagerness of this forum to believe anything posted to social media from a far-right zealot vs what is dismissed as liberal bias makes for a wild juxtaposition of double standards.

In other words, a tweet from Laura Loomer passes muster, but The Wall Street Journal is not a reliable source because they're biased. This is not the real world. It's craziness. This forum is an echo chamber. You don't realize how extreme some of your opinions are, especially when it comes to sources of information.
Click to expand...

BowlBrother85 said:
There is indeed an extreme differentiation from Laura Loomer and The Wall Street Journal. However, I have seen her social media posts treated as gospel on here. She has promoted 9/11 truther theories, Q Anon, PizzaGate, Sandy Hook Elementary hoax theories and Obama birtherism.
Click to expand...
Your in for a harsh dose of reality over the course of this term, there are no conspiracies, and there are no coincidences.
 
#64,723
#64,723
FLVOL69 said:
Your in for a harsh dose of reality over the course of this term, there are no conspiracies, and there are no coincidences.
Click to expand...
With apologies to Ralphie .....

"Donald Trump works in conspiracy theories the way other artists might work in oils or clay. It is his true medium; a master."
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top