cncchris33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2009
- Messages
- 34,469
- Likes
- 52,279
Disclaimer - This is complete speculation on my part, but it is based in the talk that we hear ZZ and Gainey's name tossed around a lot as candidates to potentially return, and not so much Mashack and Milicic.Really? How come? Barnes choice wouldn't seem to make sense unless totally focused on a offensive-minded transfer with 2 or more years of eligibility. Do you think Mashack would move on?
I...again, personal opinion...believe the staff loves Mashack's defense, effort, and leadership. I also believe he is probably viewed as a finished product, as in he's reached his ceiling. That ceiling is that of a fantastic defender and an offensive liability. I also don't necessarily believe that the offensive hole he creates is entirely talent-driven. I think he is just very passive on that end of the floor. In today's game, you can't have someone who just won't look to score when they have an opportunity. It makes your team far too easy to defend. If Barnes and Co. believe they can find an offensive player who is 60% of the defender Mashack was, I think they'd prefer to try that route and have 5 offensive threats on the floor.
Mashack would be a great fit with San Diego St. if he chose to play a 5th year. Defensive-minded program that will appreciate his approach, his voice and leadership, and it's closer to home where his family can see him more easily.
Maybe someone like @stoernerfumbles can validate that opinion. Or blow holes in it like a 12-gauge. I'm certainly open to being wrong.