CamVol8
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2013
- Messages
- 1,400
- Likes
- 1,568
He’s quoting an AI-generated response. Don’t trust it. It’s only sourcing based on what information is available, and there is nothing indicating that a 5th year decision is coming that day.
I'm not seeing anything about how many years of eligibility in the article or the proposal itself. I may have overlooked tho![]()
Conferences share new and significant progress toward implementation of House settlement - NCAA.org
Pending final court approval of the proposed settlement in the House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA and Carter v. NCAA cases (collectively, "the House case"),www.ncaa.org
Well, I didn't think it was that difficult to draw the conclusion that I was referring to their contributions to the state sheet, specifically offensive contributions. As in zero points. It wasn't meant as a derogatory insult. Just that we can't play guys that many minutes and get such little contribution on the offensive end. Mashack is another one, but his defense is on such a level that you kind of excuse his lack of offense, though I could have stood to see him be more aggressive himself. But to the point, you can get nothing from him AND get nothing from the other three guys. They combine to play nearly 40% of our minutes.Well, to be fair, you did include Cade in the group of players you referred to as "zeroes". That seems to be a bit more than just falling short of effusive praise.
I'm not seeing anything about how many years of eligibility in the article or the proposal itself. I may have overlooked tho