I see great body control with springer. But now blow by speed....the highlights i just watched showed more floaters and pull up jumpers in the paint then drives....I’ve seen Springer a number of times on the tube and his skill set is off the charts Better then SV at PG. James is as well and when he get healthy watch out
Bingo...not sure he’s that much quicker than Vescovi, he looks decently fast but he’s also playing HS kids...Vescovi looks quicker in his highlights too.I see great body control with springer. But now blow by speed....the highlights i just watched showed more floaters and pull up jumpers in the paint then drives....
JJJ had a great game, Santi did not. Part of the reason is just because of the size of Kentucky. It had less of an effect on James because he's actually bigger than any of their guards, Santi was just overwhelmed and it was obvious. He did end up making some really key plays down the stretch to make up for the rest of the game. We need James to continue to be aggressive though, as we aren't good enough for him to go into his passive mode.
IMO his perceived lack of speed and quickness is being greatly overblown. Not the fastest in the world but you guys want to make out like he needs to be playing at the local YMCA. His vision and basketball iq are outstanding. Like BTO, i think a year in the S&C program with really help him. His commitment to getting better must be very high as he has traveled the globe in pursuit of it.that’s simply
His quickness and speed even with a year of S&C isn’t going to let him all of a sudden be better than the other guys we have as options at PG
And kentucky's guards make most look slowIMO his perceived lack of speed and quickness is being greatly overblown. Not the fastest in the world but you guys want to make out like he needs to be playing at the local YMCA. His vision and basketball iq are outstanding. Like BTO, i think a year in the S&C program with really help him. His commitment to getting better must be very high as he has traveled the globe in pursuit of it.
Ashton Haggans may be the best on-ball defender Santi has ever seen, too. Maxes is no slouch. All 3 of UKs guards can play rally good defense, and Vescovi being seriously handicapped by his right hand really limits his effectiveness in the half court offense. He is at his best in transition and when things break down, defensively, and it allows him to freelance as a playmaker. Youthful indiscretion in those moments gets him into trouble at times (driving toward the baseline and jumping without an obvious outlet, for example), but that will hopefully be remedied by experience and an offseason of coaching.JJJ had a great game, Santi did not. Part of the reason is just because of the size of Kentucky. It had less of an effect on James because he's actually bigger than any of their guards, Santi was just overwhelmed and it was obvious. He did end up making some really key plays down the stretch to make up for the rest of the game. We need James to continue to be aggressive though, as we aren't good enough for him to go into his passive mode.
I was going to post this same observation after the Florida game. He has made the initial pass to the wing in better than 15 seconds but his difficulty in shaking the defender usually results in the wing receiving the ball further out from the basket. The timing and spacing are affected.but it’s not just Kentucky. He has really struggled getting us into the flow of any offense sense he’s been here. It’s really hard to be efficient on offense when the PG doesn’t get the offense moving until the shot clock is inside of 15 seconds.
Come on. Springer is significantly faster than Vescovi.Bingo...not sure he’s that much quicker than Vescovi, he looks decently fast but he’s also playing HS kids...Vescovi looks quicker in his highlights too.
Well Vescovi was playing against some former NBA guys and guys with multiple years on him, I would say that was probably stiffer competition than what Springer has faced.Come on. Springer is significantly faster than Vescovi.
One thing to note is that those aren’t just “high school kids” he’s playing against on most nights. He isn’t rolling out on the floor vs the likes of Gibbs, Seymour, and Powell high school. He is playing the elite of the elite at the HS level, and many of those kids could walk into a host of collegiate programs and get significant minutes, right this second. That’s not even to mention the players he practices against on a daily basis. Springer is going to come in much more prepared physically and having played at the biggest high school stage than your average freshman.
I agree. Even making a definitive statement about his future as an effective PG is a bit premature, even if you agree that his best position may be SG. He is just still to raw and unrefined without the benefit of an offseason of individual work. He has a very high ceiling as a player, if only a more limited ceiling as an athlete and a PG, specifically.Makes no sense to write off Vescovi. In fact it’s nuts IMO
But playing against those guys didn’t make SV quicker or more athletic. Springer is clearly a + in both those areas, and you tried to play it off as though there was little difference. That just isn’t true.Well Vescovi was playing against some former NBA guys and guys with multiple years on him, I would say that was probably stiffer competition than what Springer has faced.
But playing against those guys didn’t make SV quicker or more athletic. Springer is clearly a + in both those areas, and you tried to play it off as though there was little difference. That just isn’t true.
You do make a fair point about Vescovi’s competition, though the only mention I have seen of facing former NBAers was in one single 5 or 6 game tournament. However, my point of making mention of Springer’s competition wasn’t to compare it Vescovi’s. It was to simply refute the idea that he’s only facing HS competition. That is a lazy argument, IMO.