You don't think Chism changed UT's program? He certainly had more impact on UT than Cousins did on UK. Not only was Chism great at UT, he was a role model and example to future UT players. Neither Wall or Cousins had that type of impact.
Cousins was impressive but his numbers are inflated due to the inequality of the officiating that went in his favor. I have never seen a guy commit so many loose ball falls and not get called for them. He got ridiculous calls in his favor all year and then whined and complained when faced with any adversity.
The only time I truly respected Cousins was when he had the sense to break up a potential fight late in the season. Cousins is a dominant inside force and has more NBA potential but Chism had an overall bigger impact on games. Our offense flowed through Chis and he provided 3 pt shooting, great passing, rebounding, defense and leadership.
First of all, I won't engage in discussions about officials and favoritism, because its all biased and flawed. Thats not relative to the argument, IMO.
I did say at the end of my post that I would have chosen Chism as well. Perhaps I should elaborate on what I meant by "program changer".
Basically, it comes down to the status of your program on the national level. Are you recruiting high enough to bring in guys that are game changers in one season, or are you looking for 4 year projects? (not saying Wayne was a project). Chism is a player that needed 3-4 years to really mature. He turned out to be a special player, but it took some time. There are a lot of players out there that turn into great 4 year players.
Cousins is the type of guy that comes in and can literally change a program in one season, which is the difference between the two, IMO.
Its just a weird comparison to compare a guys 4 year career against another kids 1 year. Especially, when the latter would totally eclipse the other if he stayed in school 4 years.
I love Wayne Chism as a player, and if I had to choose between 4 years of Wayne or 1 of Cousins, I take Wayne. All I'm saying is that its not a fair comparison of the caliber of the player, which some make it out to be.
Hope that helps.