(8) Butler vs. (3) Connecticut - National Championship

#302
#302
BigPapaVol said:
KU and OSU? Seriously? Who's lottery?

Buford and Deibler will play in the NBA. Buford will likely do well.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Buford and Deibler will be lucky to be 2nd round draft picks.

Many are projecting the Morris twins in the lottery right now. And Robinson and Selby are projected late 1st/early 2nd.

If you think Buford and Deibler would get drafted if they came out right now, then you are smoking crack.
 
#303
#303
tvols75 said:
Buford and Deibler will be lucky to be 2nd round draft picks.

Many are projecting the Morris twins in the lottery right now. And Robinson and Selby are projected late 1st/early 2nd.

If you think Buford and Deibler would get drafted if they came out right now, then you are smoking crack.
Click to expand...
What's up with all of the denigrating shots when trying to discuss this silly ass basketball season?
 
#304
#304
tvols75 said:
Buford and Deibler will be lucky to be 2nd round draft picks.

Many are projecting the Morris twins in the lottery right now. And Robinson and Selby are projected late 1st/early 2nd.

If you think Buford and Deibler would get drafted if they came out right now, then you are smoking crack.
Click to expand...
They don't have anyone that will get close to Sullinger. The Morris twins are lottery because the draft blows, not because they can play with a guy like Sullinger.

This draft has a tiny number of first rounders and a gaggle of maybes.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#305
#305
BigPapaVol said:
They don't have anyone that will get close to Sullinger. The Morris twins are lottery because the draft blows, not because they can play with a guy like Sullinger.

This draft has a tiny number of first rounders and a gaggle of maybes.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Then you would think your "NBA guys" like Diebler and Buford would take advantage of it. They aren't because they know they wouldn't get drafted. So what's that tell you? And it's a weak draft, yet Lighty is projected mid to late second to undrafted. You want to use the NBA argument, yet there is one legitimate NBA player on OSU.
 
#306
#306
tvols75 said:
Then you would think your "NBA guys" like Diebler and Buford would take advantage of it. They aren't because they know they wouldn't get drafted. So what's that tell you?
Click to expand...

I asked you for the NBA players on Pitt's roster after you made them out to be better than OSU. I said OSU because they had the deepest and most complete team in the country. You're the one that ran off to Williams and Kansas. Regardless of your arguments, nobody was more to pot bottom capable than OSU.

The NBA argument was about Pitt's problem of lacking a go to. They did and paid for it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#307
#307
BigPapaVol said:
I asked you for the NBA players on Pitt's roster after you made them out to be better than OSU. I said OSU because they had the deepest and most complete team in the country. You're the one that ran off to Williams and Kansas. Regardless of your arguments, nobody was more to pot bottom capable than OSU.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

I would rather have the teams of Kansas, Pitt, and Duke.
 
#308
#308
BigPapaVol said:
I asked you for the NBA players on Pitt's roster after you made them out to be better than OSU. I said OSU because they had the deepest and most complete team in the country. You're the one that ran off to Williams and Kansas. Regardless of your arguments, nobody was more to pot bottom capable than OSU.

The NBA argument was about Pitt's problem of lacking a go to. They did and paid for it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

DeJaun Blair...Duh!!!
 
#311
#311
BigPapaVol said:
So. Duke had no post, Pitt had no go to and KU was weak in the backcourt. I wouldn't take any of them over OSU.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...


And all of those actually played legitimate competition. Ohio St.'s best win probably came against Florida very early in the year. Kentucky was a better team than Ohio St.. They may have not had as much depth, but playing on a neutral floor and coming off 4 days rest made it an even playing field, and the best talent won.
 
#313
#313
tvols75 said:
Then you would think your "NBA guys" like Diebler and Buford would take advantage of it. They aren't because they know they wouldn't get drafted. So what's that tell you? And it's a weak draft, yet Lighty is projected mid to late second to undrafted. You want to use the NBA argument, yet there is one legitimate NBA player on OSU.
Click to expand...

OSU was the best team top-to-bottom in the country this year. Not a doubt in the world. Makes it even funnier that they lost in the Sweet Sixteen.

Draft projections mean jack squat. Diebler and Buford will get drafted mid first round and Lighty will be an early second rounder, IMO. Last I checked, three is greater than one.
 
#314
#314
iuvol2012 said:
OSU was the best team top-to-bottom in the country this year. Not a doubt in the world. Makes it even funnier that they lost in the Sweet Sixteen.

Draft projections mean jack squat. Diebler and Buford will get drafted mid first round and Lighty will be an early second rounder, IMO. Last I checked, three is greater than one.
Click to expand...

You just lost all credibility if you think Diebler and Buford would get drafted mid first round. And, I just named you 4 people from Kansas so 3 is greater than 4?
 
#315
#315
tvols75 said:
You just lost all credibility if you think Diebler and Buford would get drafted mid first round. And, I just named you 4 people from Kansas so 3 is greater than 4?
Click to expand...

Wasn't talking about Kansas. Pay attention.

As its been said before, Diebler and Buford will get drafted higher because there aren't a whole lot of bona-fide first round players this year.

Just my two cents.
 
#316
#316
iuvol2012 said:
Wasn't talking about Kansas. Pay attention.

As its been said before, Diebler and Buford will get drafted higher because there aren't a whole lot of bona-fide first round players this year.

Just my two cents.
Click to expand...

Buford isn't coming out because he wouldn't get drafted. I will make a 500 dollar bet with you if you think Diebler goes mid first round.
 
#317
#317
tvols75 said:
Buford isn't coming out because he wouldn't get drafted. I will make a 500 dollar bet with you if you think Diebler goes mid first round.
Click to expand...

My prediction means about as much as anyone else's. I should also note that mid-first round is a very broad prediction on my part. I would say somewhere between 15th and 22nd.

Again, that's just my view.
 
#318
#318
BigPapaVol said:
They have more than 1, but the one you're talking about is the kind without debate. The two at UK are iffy. In fact, Jones has miles to go to get there. Knight is probably suited better to the pro game than college, but struggles going left today.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

All I know is that I have had my lifetime fill of Jones' arms-to-the-sides amped-up gestures.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#319
#319
iuvol2012 said:
My prediction means about as much as anyone else's. I should also note that mid-first round is a very broad prediction on my part. I would say somewhere between 15th and 22nd.

Again, that's just my view.
Click to expand...

I will let you go with 15-22. Want to take that $500 bet? I will PM you my paypal.
 
#321
#321
iuvol2012 said:
Nah. I'm confident enough to not have to wager money on it.
Click to expand...

Yeah because all the draft analysts have Diebler so high up there, and we all know they are always wrong. Can you name me a player that has ever been projected not even getting drafted to making the first round?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top